public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/25] Unit testing for GDB-side remote memory tagging handling
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:20:58 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322132120.1202230-5-luis.machado@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322132120.1202230-1-luis.machado@linaro.org>

Updates in v6:

- Adjust scope restoration call.

Updated in v4:

- Renamed functions based on reviews.
- Adjusted code to cope with bool return value.
- Restoring of global setting after unit testing.

Updated in v2:

- Adjusted unit tests to cope with new type field in the remote packets.

--

Include some unit testing for the functions handling the new qMemTags and
QMemTags packets.

gdb/ChangeLog:

YYYY-MM-DD  Luis Machado  <luis.machado@linaro.org>

	* remote: Include gdbsupport/selftest.h.
	(test_memory_tagging_functions): New function.
	(_initialize_remote): Register test_memory_tagging_functions.
---
 gdb/remote.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 5131d78747f..ac7c50b57ea 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
 #include <algorithm>
 #include <unordered_map>
 #include "async-event.h"
+#include "gdbsupport/selftest.h"
 
 /* The remote target.  */
 
@@ -14620,6 +14621,92 @@ remote_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
   return packet_check_result (rs->buf.data ()) == PACKET_OK;
 }
 
+#if GDB_SELF_TEST
+
+namespace selftests {
+
+static void
+test_memory_tagging_functions ()
+{
+  remote_target remote;
+
+  struct packet_config *config
+    = &remote_protocol_packets[PACKET_memory_tagging_feature];
+
+  scoped_restore restore_memtag_support_
+    = make_scoped_restore (&config->support);
+
+  /* Test memory tagging packet support.  */
+  config->support = PACKET_SUPPORT_UNKNOWN;
+  SELF_CHECK (remote.supports_memory_tagging () == false);
+  config->support = PACKET_DISABLE;
+  SELF_CHECK (remote.supports_memory_tagging () == false);
+  config->support = PACKET_ENABLE;
+  SELF_CHECK (remote.supports_memory_tagging () == true);
+
+  /* Setup testing.  */
+  gdb::char_vector packet;
+  gdb::byte_vector tags, bv;
+  std::string expected, reply;
+  packet.resize (32000);
+
+  /* Test creating a qMemTags request.  */
+
+  expected = "qMemTags:0,0:0";
+  create_fetch_memtags_request (packet, 0x0, 0x0, 0);
+  SELF_CHECK (strcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str ()) == 0);
+
+  expected = "qMemTags:deadbeef,10:1";
+  create_fetch_memtags_request (packet, 0xdeadbeef, 16, 1);
+  SELF_CHECK (strcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str ()) == 0);
+
+  /* Test parsing a qMemTags reply.  */
+
+  /* Error reply, tags vector unmodified.  */
+  reply = "E00";
+  strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ());
+  tags.resize (0);
+  SELF_CHECK (parse_fetch_memtags_reply (packet, tags) == false);
+  SELF_CHECK (tags.size () == 0);
+
+  /* Valid reply, tags vector updated.  */
+  tags.resize (0);
+  bv.resize (0);
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+    bv.push_back (i);
+
+  reply = "m" + bin2hex (bv.data (), bv.size ());
+  strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ());
+
+  SELF_CHECK (parse_fetch_memtags_reply (packet, tags) == true);
+  SELF_CHECK (tags.size () == 5);
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+    SELF_CHECK (tags[i] == i);
+
+  /* Test creating a QMemTags request.  */
+
+  /* Empty tag data.  */
+  tags.resize (0);
+  expected = "QMemTags:0,0:0:";
+  create_store_memtags_request (packet, 0x0, 0x0, 0, tags);
+  SELF_CHECK (memcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str (),
+		      expected.length ()) == 0);
+
+  /* Non-empty tag data.  */
+  tags.resize (0);
+  for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+    tags.push_back (i);
+  expected = "QMemTags:deadbeef,ff:1:0001020304";
+  create_store_memtags_request (packet, 0xdeadbeef, 255, 1, tags);
+  SELF_CHECK (memcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str (),
+		      expected.length ()) == 0);
+}
+
+} // namespace selftests
+#endif /* GDB_SELF_TEST */
+
 void _initialize_remote ();
 void
 _initialize_remote ()
@@ -15153,4 +15240,9 @@ from the target."),
 
   /* Eventually initialize fileio.  See fileio.c */
   initialize_remote_fileio (&remote_set_cmdlist, &remote_show_cmdlist);
+
+#if GDB_SELF_TEST
+  selftests::register_test ("remote_memory_tagging",
+			    selftests::test_memory_tagging_functions);
+#endif
 }
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 13:20 [PATCH v6 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:20 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] New target methods for memory tagging support Luis Machado
2021-03-23 21:22   ` Simon Marchi
2021-03-22 13:20 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] New gdbarch memory tagging hooks Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:20 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:20 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2021-03-22 13:20 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] GDBserver remote packet " Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] Unit tests for gdbserver memory tagging remote packets Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] Documentation for " Luis Machado
2021-03-22 17:47   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] AArch64: Add MTE CPU feature check support Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] AArch64: Add target description/feature for MTE registers Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for GDB and gdbserver Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] AArch64: Add MTE ptrace requests Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] AArch64: Implement memory tagging target methods for AArch64 Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] Convert char array to std::string in linux_find_memory_regions_full Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] Refactor parsing of /proc/<pid>/smaps Luis Machado
2021-03-23 21:28   ` Simon Marchi
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] AArch64: Implement the memory tagging gdbarch hooks Luis Machado
2021-03-23 21:32   ` Simon Marchi
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] AArch64: Add unit testing for logical tag set/get operations Luis Machado
2022-01-31 14:34   ` Simon Marchi
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] AArch64: Report tag violation error information Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] AArch64: Add gdbserver MTE support Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for core files Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] New memory-tag commands Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] Documentation for the new mtag commands Luis Machado
2021-03-22 17:49   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] Extend "x" and "print" commands to support memory tagging Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions Luis Machado
2021-03-22 17:51   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] Add NEWS entry Luis Machado
2021-03-22 17:51   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-22 17:52     ` Luis Machado
2021-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] Add memory tagging testcases Luis Machado
2021-03-23 22:50 ` [PATCH v6 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Simon Marchi
2021-03-24 18:18   ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322132120.1202230-5-luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --to=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).