From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
To: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix raw-frame-arguments in combination with frame-filters
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:48:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210517094824.GM3067949@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210131134611.3255-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de>
* Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> [2021-01-31 14:46:11 +0100]:
> Currently, if frame-filters are active, raw-values is used instead of
> raw-frame-arguments to decide if a pretty-printer should be invoked for
> frame arguments in a backtrace.
>
> In this example, "super struct" is the output of the pretty-printer:
>
> (gdb) disable frame-filter global BasicFrameFilter
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
>
> If no frame-filter is active, then the raw-values print option does not
> affect the backtrace output:
>
> (gdb) set print raw-values on
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
> (gdb) set print raw-values off
>
> Instead, the raw-frame-arguments option disables the pretty-printer in the
> backtrace:
>
> (gdb) bt -raw-frame-arguments on
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=...) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
>
> But if a frame-filter is active, the same rules don't apply.
> The option raw-frame-arguments is ignored, but raw-values decides if the
> pretty-printer is used:
>
> (gdb) enable frame-filter global BasicFrameFilter
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
> (gdb) set print raw-values on
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=...) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
> (gdb) set print raw-values off
> (gdb) bt -raw-frame-arguments on
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
>
> So this adds the PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS flag to frame_filter_flag, which
> is then used in the frame-filter to override the raw flag in enumerate_args.
>
> Then the output is the same if a frame-filter is active, the pretty-printer
> for backtraces is only disabled with the raw-frame-arguments option:
>
> (gdb) enable frame-filter global BasicFrameFilter
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
> (gdb) set print raw-values on
> (gdb) bt
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=super struct = {...}) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
> (gdb) set print raw-values off
> (gdb) bt -raw-frame-arguments on
> #0 foo (x=42, ss=...) at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:47
> #1 0x004016aa in main () at C:/src/repos/gdb-testsuite/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.c:57
Thanks for working on improving this behaviour.
I think that there's something weird going on with the MI behaviour.
I ran the py-frame-args.c test program, stopped at line 47, then I see
this:
(gdb) set print raw-frame-arguments off
(gdb) set print raw-values off
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-variables 1"
^done,variables=[{name="x",arg="1",value="42"},{name="ss",arg="1",value="super struct = {\n a = m=<1>,\n b = m=<2>\n}"}]
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-arguments 1"
^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[{name="x",value="42"},{name="ss",value="super struct = {\n a = m=<1>,\n b = m=<2>\n}"}]},frame={level="1",args=[]}]
(gdb) set print raw-frame-arguments on
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-arguments 1"
^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[{name="x",value="42"},{name="ss",value="super struct = {\n a = m=<1>,\n b = m=<2>\n}"}]},frame={level="1",args=[]}]
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-variables 1"
^done,variables=[{name="x",arg="1",value="42"},{name="ss",arg="1",value="super struct = {\n a = m=<1>,\n b = m=<2>\n}"}]
(gdb) set print raw-values on
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-arguments 1"
^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[{name="x",value="42"},{name="ss",value="super struct = {\n a = m=<1>,\n b = m=<2>\n}"}]},frame={level="1",args=[]}]
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-stack-list-variables 1"
^done,variables=[{name="x",arg="1",value="42"},{name="ss",arg="1",value="{\n a = {\n m = 1\n },\n b = {\n m = 2\n }\n}"}]
(gdb)
The summary is:
- when just doing '-stack-list-arguments' neither 'set print
raw-values' or 'set print raw-frame-arguments' seem to effect what
is printed, and
- when doing '-stack-list-variables', 'set print raw-values' seems
to effect how arguments are printed, but 'set print
raw-frame-arguments' does not.
I guess I would expect 'set print raw-frame-arguments' to be the
controlling option in both these cases.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-01-31 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
>
> * extension.h (enum frame_filter_flag): Add
> PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS.
> * python/py-framefilter.c (enumerate_args): Override raw flag.
> raw_frame_args argument.
> (py_mi_print_variables): Forward raw flag.
> (py_print_args): Forward raw_frame_args flag.
> (py_print_frame): Handle PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS.
> * stack.c (backtrace_command_1): Set PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-01-31 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
>
> * gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp: Add bt raw-frame-arguments tests.
> * gdb.python/py-frame-args.py: Add basic frame-filter.
> ---
> v2:
> - More detailed commit message describing the problem.
> ---
> gdb/extension.h | 4 ++++
> gdb/python/py-framefilter.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> gdb/stack.c | 2 ++
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.py | 13 +++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/extension.h b/gdb/extension.h
> index a505c68d25e..7067e232cd3 100644
> --- a/gdb/extension.h
> +++ b/gdb/extension.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ enum frame_filter_flag
>
> /* Set this flag if elided frames should not be printed. */
> PRINT_HIDE = 1 << 5,
> +
> + /* Set this flag if pretty printers for frame arguments should not
> + be invoked. */
> + PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS = 1 << 6,
> };
>
> DEF_ENUM_FLAGS_TYPE (enum frame_filter_flag, frame_filter_flags);
> diff --git a/gdb/python/py-framefilter.c b/gdb/python/py-framefilter.c
> index 6dd741ab704..e53e3409235 100644
> --- a/gdb/python/py-framefilter.c
> +++ b/gdb/python/py-framefilter.c
> @@ -422,12 +422,14 @@ static enum ext_lang_bt_status
> enumerate_args (PyObject *iter,
> struct ui_out *out,
> enum ext_lang_frame_args args_type,
> + bool raw_frame_args,
> int print_args_field,
> struct frame_info *frame)
> {
> struct value_print_options opts;
>
> get_user_print_options (&opts);
> + opts.raw = raw_frame_args;
>
> if (args_type == CLI_SCALAR_VALUES)
> {
> @@ -655,8 +657,8 @@ py_mi_print_variables (PyObject *filter, struct ui_out *out,
> ui_out_emit_list list_emitter (out, "variables");
>
> if (args_iter != Py_None
> - && (enumerate_args (args_iter.get (), out, args_type, 1, frame)
> - == EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR))
> + && (enumerate_args (args_iter.get (), out, args_type, opts->raw, 1,
> + frame) == EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR))
> return EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR;
>
> if (locals_iter != Py_None
> @@ -701,6 +703,7 @@ static enum ext_lang_bt_status
> py_print_args (PyObject *filter,
> struct ui_out *out,
> enum ext_lang_frame_args args_type,
> + bool raw_frame_args,
> struct frame_info *frame)
> {
> gdbpy_ref<> args_iter (get_py_iter_from_func (filter, "frame_args"));
> @@ -726,7 +729,8 @@ py_print_args (PyObject *filter,
> }
> }
> else if (args_iter != Py_None
> - && (enumerate_args (args_iter.get (), out, args_type, 0, frame)
> + && (enumerate_args (args_iter.get (), out, args_type,
> + raw_frame_args, 0, frame)
> == EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR))
> return EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR;
>
> @@ -957,7 +961,9 @@ py_print_frame (PyObject *filter, frame_filter_flags flags,
> wrong. */
> if (print_args && (location_print || out->is_mi_like_p ()))
> {
> - if (py_print_args (filter, out, args_type, frame) == EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR)
> + bool raw_frame_args = (flags & PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS) != 0;
> + if (py_print_args (filter, out, args_type, raw_frame_args, frame)
> + == EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR)
> return EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR;
> }
>
> diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
> index bce6a2f42f8..dbca5ade1c2 100644
> --- a/gdb/stack.c
> +++ b/gdb/stack.c
> @@ -2028,6 +2028,8 @@ backtrace_command_1 (const frame_print_options &fp_opts,
> flags |= PRINT_LOCALS;
> if (bt_opts.hide)
> flags |= PRINT_HIDE;
> + if (fp_opts.print_raw_frame_arguments)
> + flags |= PRINT_RAW_FRAME_ARGUMENTS;
>
> if (!bt_opts.no_filters)
> {
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp
> index 5d35323c0e6..dae0c0ac29e 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.exp
> @@ -34,6 +34,26 @@ gdb_test_no_output "source ${remote_python_file}" "load python file"
> gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "break-here"]
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "break-here" ".* break-here .*"
>
> +# Test raw-frame-arguments on backtrace with and without frame-filter
> +foreach_with_prefix filtered {enable disable} {
> + gdb_test_no_output "$filtered frame-filter global BasicFrameFilter"
> +
> + gdb_test "bt 1" \
> + ".*foo \\(x=42, ss=super struct = {\[.\]{3}}\\).*" \
> + "bt pretty"
> +
> + gdb_test "bt -raw-frame-arguments on 1" \
> + ".*foo \\(x=42, ss=\[.\]{3}\\).*" \
> + "bt raw"
> +
> + # "set print raw-values" should not affect frame arguments
> + gdb_test_no_output "set print raw-values on"
> + gdb_test "bt 1" \
> + ".*foo \\(x=42, ss=super struct = {\[.\]{3}}\\).*" \
> + "bt pretty,raw-values"
> + gdb_test_no_output "set print raw-values off"
> +}
> +
> # Test all combinations with raw off.
>
> gdb_test_no_output "set print raw-frame-arguments off"
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.py b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.py
> index d80d761b995..3b65eed0dad 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.py
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-frame-args.py
> @@ -73,3 +73,16 @@ pretty_printers_dict = {}
>
> register_pretty_printers ()
> gdb.pretty_printers.append (lookup_function)
> +
> +
> +class BasicFrameFilter (object):
> + def __init__ (self):
> + self.name = "BasicFrameFilter"
> + self.priority = 100
> + self.enabled = True
> + gdb.frame_filters[self.name] = self
> +
> + def filter (self, frame_iter):
> + return frame_iter
> +
> +BasicFrameFilter ()
> --
> 2.30.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210131134611.3255-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2021-01-31 13:46 ` Hannes Domani
2021-02-14 15:51 ` [PING] " Hannes Domani
2021-05-17 9:48 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2021-05-17 10:54 ` Hannes Domani
2021-05-27 18:31 ` Hannes Domani
2021-06-02 13:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-04 14:03 ` Hannes Domani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210517094824.GM3067949@embecosm.com \
--to=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ssbssa@yahoo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).