* GDB 11 branching update (2021-05-24)
@ 2021-05-24 19:48 Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2021-05-24 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hello everyone,
Quick update on the GDB 11 branching; unfortunately, not a lot of
progress that I could see when I did the review; let me know if
I missed anything!
Fixed Since the Previous Update:
--------------------------------
< none >
Added Since the Last Update:
----------------------------
* [SimonM] <PR python/27841>
Failed assertion: assigning convenience variable during inferior exit Python event
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27841
patch v2: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-May/178716.html
v2 approved, but waiting for copyright assignment process to be completed
* [TomDV] <PR symtab/26327>
GDB hangs in get_builder() due to recursive ancestor pointers
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26327
There was a patch, but it caused some regressions, and thus
it has been reverted, making us reopen this PR.
One comment in the PR says:
| The problem is not that we search ancestors, the problem is that
| we allow ancestors to form a loop. See detailed investigation at
| <URL: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185800 >. Your
| fix looks more like a band-aid to me.
* [MikeF] using gnulib in sim (patches pending)
* [LuisM] AArch64 MTE issues
- ???
- core file support
* [RainerO] <PR binutils/27666>
ar doesn't create indices on Solaris/sparcv9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27666
Causes large number of tests to fail in gdb's testsuite.
Patch has been proposed by NickC, to be tested by RainerO
(uploaded to bugzilla). Worse case scenario, we can branch
and then revert the binutils patch that caused the issue.
Other Ongoing Items:
--------------------
* [Sergey with Simon as reviewer] <PR tdep/26633>
Add Z80 CPU support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26633
Patch submitted at:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/172083.html
* [AndrewB/Simon] <PR gdb/26819>
Bug 26819 - RISC-V: internal-error: int finish_step_over(execution_control_state*): Assertion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26819
I think the situation has been improved thanks to a couple of
patches, but the user still has some scenarios where the issue
happens.
* [Simon] <PR gdb/26868>
Follow-up on x86-64 stub submission
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26868
This is the submission in question:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-November/173182.html
For me, although I am not a lawyer, I don't think we can accept
the contribution without the author signing a copyright assignment
form.
* [Simon/Kevin] <PR gdb/27526>
Attaching to threaded process on glibc 2.33: libthread_db fails to initialize with "generic error"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27526
Patch v2 at:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-May/178485.html
Not Critical, but Requested:
----------------------------
< none :) >
Thank you!
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-05-24 19:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-24 19:48 GDB 11 branching update (2021-05-24) Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).