From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551F03858D34 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:35:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 551F03858D34 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embecosm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=embecosm.com Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id h13so24248470wrp.1 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:35:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=embecosm.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=W1+xyLrPznxPfW30YUsQ99S2Bl/3l0U3iY95esAZ2B8=; b=Wq+c/5JwGsvsZ7ysAqySsCNrVKLTJjQhvC4CnF5HGDbILwV5pco4JgvDyzSad8ZGeG BJBSkyiV367rUwtc0GUixtrTiL7Oc8P8wMiQzQLBBqsFvhomHYjR/I7IPsfWZ26po3Ho +N0F5rIah7iMtC0xMQBJcyQWF/+4zeRXJ0a5UmuBx46M3sWSiuB0JQHUYnQo1eBSQgTh 1dUGXdQbjpbun/+KSaKPAvFCRcAN4SpVOFnr8hP4DsRxXPA7POz/DsrFiZxqXw8DwaPT Pkb9/TQVVlQs6ToKpvLZBAoGf/LKPTcyrJ3VuMdwBtN8pSHKPjMIpzkZHwHU3q30ZaVH 3WbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=W1+xyLrPznxPfW30YUsQ99S2Bl/3l0U3iY95esAZ2B8=; b=BBmqmeWdodepA/8DyjAK1pfB+53A3Ojwdf9o4hmtt7sQn2QRYkhQHebKxERcFaChK3 luxFQrx1OWb69NvaShpnMFspOAR1h3h9I3/1rtpbPEPqYuOQGQLdkISd5Vd23lqR/d0D R2RHldezt8IUA4g4yQ8wAVlLtLqSVuSM4TxPgYKO20oJ5pxLrZw1qEqm5v8STw8IWO8+ Hg6ogLGbbXMyS+ujB4+9FX9VsIHC4Elt/grQFPOfgAi3WaXIb1hxMRIEdhvq5H2hUwNo 8aJb87D1zcUgwJvpYhGpOb7KeCjwaV3d26eAU/iVR/Q/2DzCYa7T9jDKxsyHKjL+L0zG XbPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wUOTMuwvtSojXFXPMkoqjeH/MnwzYEaij242PscNhpSzdNBKx N918w9L1EKhM+DbC1bwHui4pAQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvUhTnZg2o/rGWK/SncGVZMQoukJFFP0Skb4YHui+KAFlsvTx5e+szyTQgqlQjsEN1ors1pg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6e91:: with SMTP id k17mr27729421wrz.77.1630355725504; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host86-188-49-44.range86-188.btcentralplus.com. [86.188.49.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o10sm17325815wrc.16.2021.08.30.13.35.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 21:35:24 +0100 From: Andrew Burgess To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Display GDB backtrace for internal errors Message-ID: <20210830203524.GN2581@embecosm.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux/5.8.18-100.fc31.x86_64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 21:34:57 up 13 days, 9:31, X-Editor: GNU Emacs [ http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs ] X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:35:36 -0000 * Tom de Vries [2021-08-30 16:16:09 +0200]: > On 8/19/21 11:49 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > > This series does two things: > > > > 1. Imports libbacktrace from gcc to present better backtraces of > > GDB when we hit a fatal signal, and > > > > 2. Prints the backtrace when GDB hits an internal-error (e.g. an > > assert). > > > > The hope here is to try an improve the quality of bug reports, instead > > of just getting a report that GDB hit some assert in frame.c, or > > value.c, we will (hopefully) have a backtrace included with the bug > > report, which _might_ give developers a fighting chance at figuring > > out what went wrong. > > > > Nice :) > > This means you can claim PR26377 - "generate backtrace upon assert", I'm > guessing in the last patch of the series. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll add a link to that bug in the commit message. Andrew