[PATCH v2 2/2] Move a comment to a less confusing place

[Christian Walther <walther@indel.ch>]

Make it clearer that this comment (from 2024f65) does not apply to the
call to check_typedef further down, which is not on the return value of
get_target_type.
---
 gdb/c-varobj.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/c-varobj.c b/gdb/c-varobj.c
index 64c3a9ebf1c..acda879bfeb 100644
--- a/gdb/c-varobj.c
+++ b/gdb/c-varobj.c
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ adjust_value_for_child_access (struct value **value,
   if ((*type)->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
     {
       struct type *target_type = get_target_type (*type);
+      /* The 'get_target_type' function calls check_typedef on
+	 result, so we can immediately check type code.  No
+	 need to call check_typedef here.  */
       if (target_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT
 	  || target_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_UNION)
 	{
@@ -108,10 +111,6 @@ adjust_value_for_child_access (struct value **value,
 	}
     }
 
-  /* The 'get_target_type' function calls check_typedef on
-     result, so we can immediately check type code.  No
-     need to call check_typedef here.  */
-
   /* Access a real type of the value (if necessary and possible).  */
   if (value && *value && lookup_actual_type)
     {
-- 
2.25.1