public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [PATCH][gdb] Block SIGTERM in worker threads
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:58:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630095824.GA24025@delia.home> (raw)

Hi,

With gdb build with gcc-12 and -fsanitize=thread, and test-case
gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp, I run into:
...
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=9722)^M
  Write of size 4 at 0x00000325bc68 by thread T1:^M
  #0 handle_sigterm(int) src/gdb/event-top.c:1211 (gdb+0x8ec01f)^M
  ...
  Previous read of size 4 at 0x00000325bc68 by main thread:^M
    [failed to restore the stack]^M
^M
  Location is global 'sync_quit_force_run' of size 4 at \
  0x00000325bc68 (gdb+0x325bc68)^M
  ...
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race gdb/event-top.c:1211 in \
  handle_sigterm(int)^M
...
and 3 more data races involving handle_sigterm and locations:
- active_ext_lang
- quit_flag
- heap block of size 40
  (XNEW (async_signal_handler) in create_async_signal_handler)

This was reported in PR29297.

The testcase executes a "kill -TERM $gdb_pid", which generates a
process-directed signal.

A process-directed signal can be delivered to any thread, and what we see
here is the fallout of the signal being delivered to a worker thread rather
than the main thread.

Fix this by blocking SIGTERM in the worker threads.

[ I have not been able to reproduce this after it occurred for the first time,
so unfortunately I cannot confirm that the patch fixes the problem. ]

Tested on x86_64-linux, with and without -fsanitize=thread.

Any comments?

Thanks,
- Tom

[gdb] Block SIGTERM in worker threads

---
 gdbsupport/block-signals.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gdbsupport/block-signals.h b/gdbsupport/block-signals.h
index cf97208c750..4703690a4ec 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/block-signals.h
+++ b/gdbsupport/block-signals.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ class block_signals
     sigaddset (&mask, SIGCHLD);
     sigaddset (&mask, SIGALRM);
     sigaddset (&mask, SIGWINCH);
+    sigaddset (&mask, SIGTERM);
     gdb_sigmask (SIG_BLOCK, &mask, &m_old_mask);
 #endif
   }

             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-30  9:58 Tom de Vries [this message]
2022-06-30 11:08 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220630095824.GA24025@delia.home \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).