[PATCH 7/8] gdbserver: switch to right process in find_one_thread

[Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>]

When I do this:

    $ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory -q \
        /bin/sleep \
	-ex "maint set target-non-stop on" \
	-ex "tar ext :1234" \
	-ex "set remote exec-file /bin/sleep" \
	-ex "run 1231 &" \
	-ex add-inferior \
	-ex "inferior 2"
    Reading symbols from /bin/sleep...
    (No debugging symbols found in /bin/sleep)
    Remote debugging using :1234
    Starting program: /bin/sleep 1231
    Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
    warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead.
    Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
    Reading /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a6/7a1408f18db3576757eea210d07ba3fc560dff.debug from remote target...
    [New inferior 2]
    Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (extended-remote :1234)
    [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
    (gdb) Reading /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 from remote target...
    attach 3659848
    Attaching to process 3659848
    /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.

The internal error of GDB is actually caused by GDBserver crashing, and
the error recovery of GDB is not on point.  This patch aims to fix just
the GDBserver crash, not the GDB problem.

GDBserver crashes with a segfault here:

    (gdb) bt
    #0  0x00005555557fb3f4 in find_one_thread (ptid=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:177
    #1  0x00005555557fd5cf in thread_db_thread_handle (ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0)
        at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:461
    #2  0x000055555578a0b6 in linux_process_target::thread_handle (this=0x5555558a64c0 <the_x86_target>, ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400,
        handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:6905
    #3  0x00005555556dfcc6 in handle_qxfer_threads_worker (thread=0x60b000000510, buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1645
    #4  0x00005555556e00e6 in operator() (__closure=0x7fffffffc5e0, thread=0x60b000000510) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1696
    #5  0x00005555556f54be in for_each_thread<handle_qxfer_threads_proper(buffer*)::<lambda(thread_info*)> >(struct {...}) (func=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbthread.h:159
    #6  0x00005555556e0242 in handle_qxfer_threads_proper (buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1694
    #7  0x00005555556e04ba in handle_qxfer_threads (annex=0x629000000213 "", readbuf=0x621000019100 '\276' <repeats 200 times>..., writebuf=0x0, offset=0, len=4097)
        at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1732
    #8  0x00005555556e1989 in handle_qxfer (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2045
    #9  0x00005555556e720a in handle_query (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2685
    #10 0x00005555556f1a01 in process_serial_event () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4176
    #11 0x00005555556f4457 in handle_serial_event (err=0, client_data=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4514
    #12 0x0000555555820f56 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x607000000250, ready_mask=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573
    #13 0x0000555555821895 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694
    #14 0x000055555581f533 in gdb_do_one_event (mstimeout=-1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:264
    #15 0x00005555556ec9fb in start_event_loop () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3512
    #16 0x00005555556f0769 in captured_main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3992
    #17 0x00005555556f0e3f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4078

The reason is a wrong current process when find_one_thread is called.
The current process is the 2nd one, which was just attached.  It does
not yet have thread_db data (proc->priv->thread_db is nullptr).  As we
iterate on all threads of all process to fulfull the qxfer:threads:read
request, we get to a thread of process 1 for which we haven't read
thread_db information yet (lwp_info::thread_known is false), so we get
into find_one_thread.  find_one_thread uses
`current_process ()->priv->thread_db`, assuming the current process
matches the ptid passed as a parameter, which is wrong.  A segfault
happens when trying to dereference that thread_db pointer.

Fix this by making find_one_thread not assume what the current process /
current thread is.  If it needs to call into libthread_db, which we know
will try to read memory from the current process, then temporarily set
the current process.

In the case where the thread is already know and we return early, we
don't need to switch process.

I hit this case when running the test included with the following patch,
"gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill", so the fix is exercised by
that test.

Change-Id: I09b00883e8b73b7e5f89d0f47cb4e9c0f3d6caaa
---
 gdbserver/thread-db.cc | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdbserver/thread-db.cc b/gdbserver/thread-db.cc
index 6e0e2228a5f..bf98ca9557a 100644
--- a/gdbserver/thread-db.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/thread-db.cc
@@ -155,30 +155,35 @@ thread_db_state_str (td_thr_state_e state)
 }
 #endif
 
-/* Get thread info about PTID, accessing memory via the current
-   thread.  */
+/* Get thread info about PTID.  */
 
 static int
 find_one_thread (ptid_t ptid)
 {
-  td_thrhandle_t th;
-  td_thrinfo_t ti;
-  td_err_e err;
-  struct lwp_info *lwp;
-  struct thread_db *thread_db = current_process ()->priv->thread_db;
-  int lwpid = ptid.lwp ();
-
   thread_info *thread = find_thread_ptid (ptid);
-  lwp = get_thread_lwp (thread);
+  lwp_info *lwp = get_thread_lwp (thread);
   if (lwp->thread_known)
     return 1;
 
-  /* Get information about this thread.  */
-  err = thread_db->td_ta_map_lwp2thr_p (thread_db->thread_agent, lwpid, &th);
+  /* Get information about this thread.  libthread_db will need to read some
+     memory, which will be done on the current process, so make PTID's process
+     the current one.  */
+  process_info *proc = find_process_pid (ptid.pid ());
+  gdb_assert (proc != nullptr);
+
+  scoped_restore_current_thread restore_thread;
+  switch_to_process (proc);
+
+  thread_db *thread_db = proc->priv->thread_db;
+  td_thrhandle_t th;
+  int lwpid = ptid.lwp ();
+  td_err_e err = thread_db->td_ta_map_lwp2thr_p (thread_db->thread_agent, lwpid,
+						 &th);
   if (err != TD_OK)
     error ("Cannot get thread handle for LWP %d: %s",
 	   lwpid, thread_db_err_str (err));
 
+  td_thrinfo_t ti;
   err = thread_db->td_thr_get_info_p (&th, &ti);
   if (err != TD_OK)
     error ("Cannot get thread info for LWP %d: %s",
-- 
2.37.3