From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DEB38518AD for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:58:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 85DEB38518AD Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=polymtl.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=polymtl.ca Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 2ANIwpa1007711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:58:55 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 2ANIwpa1007711 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=polymtl.ca; s=default; t=1669229936; bh=RV042Cc7oMNxKOEvYQaTt6VQEYeUqLuNkF6u6kmpHMQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AqdB3p5menJi1MnYGCSwpSBQOhe2koPNTq/dGEXk1I2OJRQE7mbgri84iaZB7HEeC ihd8wFVMFVVjxP8oXgW3/l7qdRevKvsh8hzpQYL2CzyqE7jDAn13+bZJPjkt55x18J Y4cCwAThSo23oPWaleyoLUxs+pWIcVjpfcTWxQc0= Received: from simark.localdomain (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E57621E129; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:40:03 -0500 (EST) From: Simon Marchi To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Simon Marchi Subject: [PATCH 05/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: use proc_with_prefix for test_next_with_recursion Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:39:50 -0500 Message-Id: <20221123183959.2476477-6-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221123183959.2476477-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> References: <20221123183959.2476477-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:58:51 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3189.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This one is already in a proc, just make the proc use proc_with_prefix, for consistency. Change-Id: I313ecf5097ff04526c29396529baeba84e37df5a --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp index 7e410b4adeec..a888de8e2715 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple "finish" "finish from outermost frame disallowed" { # Test "next" over recursive function call. # -proc test_next_with_recursion {} { +proc_with_prefix test_next_with_recursion {} { global gdb_prompt global decimal global binfile -- 2.38.1