From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lndn.lancelotsix.com (lndn.lancelotsix.com [51.195.220.111]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC6F39428F4 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:32:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3EC6F39428F4 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=lancelotsix.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lancelotsix.com Received: from ubuntu.lan (unknown [IPv6:2a02:390:9086::635]) by lndn.lancelotsix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0660D8082C; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:32:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lancelotsix.com; s=2021; t=1670491939; bh=3dLH9vLQ8j2ijB8nrh7Ze4hBmyYUsZIiI2c7oWAqYHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E6+Y1Qu9sX08CqUiHFUxfptFgEiUuo7BBi4Suvb+M9/G9kDADFKVYQehMNzmnUVin mDiSJbrjLDw1CR3pW6BB1NFJnCmKXFONiXxDs9UZaeAThFAwUqf9YwPWew7k9oslXd W40vVUNT7zOG2hwRp9irEJADWSq6Xlx9UBfKFybvZ+7OL3gBD2I4pNrfxRKoX8ISYI x2fXKzb5jA3N9wVBwiFtImq0AYCAxFO7x4gGopU2wTynE/Pwtx4ZUSWx/jbJo57Qk2 ZTJPr9DvFRVZ9Ww2r4zxWea3nWy0SOQtvNBJq+37phLz2wDJZPFGEO0/PHsIjvRtAj aw91cyoAFIB6w== Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:32:12 +0000 From: Lancelot SIX To: Bruno Larsen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: add 'maintenance print record-instruction' command Message-ID: <20221208093212.ezujirvp4nbdth3r@ubuntu.lan> References: <20221207135000.1344331-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <20221207143731.uopir7l4ilssjkqv@ubuntu.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (lndn.lancelotsix.com [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 08 Dec 2022 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > None maintenance_print functions end with _command, so I don't think it is a > hard rule, but if you think I should add it, I can do it. Indeed, maintenance commands do not have seem to have this prefix, so you should leave it as it is. My bad. Best, Lancelot. > > I agree with everything else you said, it'll all be fixed in v2. > > -- > Cheers, > Bruno >