From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [pushed] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/corefile.exp with glibc 2.35
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 07:27:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221231062712.28873-1-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
On Ubuntu 22.04.1 x86_64 (with glibc 2.35), I run into:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/corefile.exp: $_exitcode is void
bt^M
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (...) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44^M
#1 __pthread_kill_internal (...) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78^M
#2 __GI___pthread_kill (...) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89^M
#3 0x00007f4985e1a476 in __GI_raise (...) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26^M
#4 0x00007f4985e007f3 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79^M
#5 0x0000556b4ea4b504 in func2 () at gdb.base/coremaker.c:153^M
#6 0x0000556b4ea4b516 in func1 () at gdb.base/coremaker.c:159^M
#7 0x0000556b4ea4b578 in main (...) at gdb.base/coremaker.c:171^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/corefile.exp: backtrace
up^M
#1 __pthread_kill_internal (...) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78^M
78 in ./nptl/pthread_kill.c^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: up
...
The problem is that the regexp used here:
...
gdb_test "up" "#\[0-9\]* *\[0-9xa-fH'\]* in .* \\(.*\\).*" "up"
...
does not fit the __pthread_kill_internal line which lacks the instruction
address due to inlining.
Fix this by making the regexp less strict.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
index f15e1e9e81d..a7b4412f306 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/corefile.exp
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ gdb_test "print \$_exitcode" " = void" \
# file correctly. I don't think the other tests do this.
gdb_test "bt" "abort.*func2.*func1.*main.*" "backtrace"
-gdb_test "up" "#\[0-9\]* *\[0-9xa-fH'\]* in .* \\(.*\\).*" "up"
+gdb_test "up" "#\[0-9\]* *(\[0-9xa-fH'\]* in)? .* \\(.*\\).*" "up"
# Test ability to read mmap'd data
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ gdb_test "x/wx buf3" "$hex:\[ \t\]+0x00000000" \
# test reinit_frame_cache
gdb_load ${binfile}
-gdb_test "up" "#\[0-9\]* *\[0-9xa-fH'\]* in .* \\(.*\\).*" "up (reinit)"
+gdb_test "up" "#\[0-9\]* *(\[0-9xa-fH'\]* in)? .* \\(.*\\).*" "up (reinit)"
gdb_test "core" "No core file now."
base-commit: 2da7ec8e8a722c146a9b7b9e52ad3b31f14256fa
--
2.35.3
reply other threads:[~2022-12-31 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221231062712.28873-1-tdevries@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).