public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [pushed] [gdb/testsuite] Use maint ignore-probes in gdb.base/longjmp.exp
Date: Wed,  8 Feb 2023 13:46:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230208124652.29570-1-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)

Test-case gdb.base/longjmp.exp handles both the case that there is a libc
longjmp probe, and the case that there isn't.

However, it only tests one of the two cases.

Use maint ignore-probes to test both cases, if possible.

Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp | 295 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 157 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
index 27a60bc4502..96d9c1c8059 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
@@ -25,181 +25,200 @@ if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {deb
      return -1
 }
 
-clean_restart ${binfile}
+proc do_test { with_probes } {
+    clean_restart ${::binfile}
 
-if {![runto_main]} {
-   return 0
-}
+    if { !$with_probes } {
+	gdb_test "maint ignore-probes libc ^longjmp$"
+    }
 
-# With a libc with probes, all tests should pass.
-#
-# Without probes, we can still set a break on longjmp, but getting the longjmp
-# target may not work, in the following cases:
-# - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target_p (gdbarch) == 0: not implemented.
-# - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch) == 0: for instance on amd64 if
-#   tdep->jb_pc_offset == -1.
-# - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch) != 0: if we have a glibc with
-#   pointer mangling ( https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PointerEncryption )
-#   then we retrieve a mangled longjmp target that needs to be demangled.
-#   For instance on amd64 with target board unix/-m32.
-#
-# Pointer demangling is currently not implemented for any target.
-# For the amd64 case, this would require copying for instance this:
-#   48 c1 ca 11             ror    $0x11,%rdx
-#   64 48 33 14 25 30 00    xor    %fs:0x30,%rdx
-# into a scratch space, save the register set, set %rdx to the mangled
-# longjmp target, displaced-step through the two insn and read the
-# demangled longjmp target from %rdx, and restore the register set.
-#
-# The failure mode in the first two cases is that the next degrades into a
-# continue.  The failure mode in the latter case is a failure to set a
-# breakpoint (matched by re_cannot_insert_bp) and a stop in longjmp.
-#
-# We detect the different failure modes and kfail these.
+    if {![runto_main]} {
+	return 0
+    }
 
-set have_longjmp_probe 0
-gdb_test_multiple "info probes stap libc ^longjmp$" "" {
-    -re -wrap "No probes matched\\." {
-	pass $gdb_test_name
+    # With a libc with probes, all tests should pass.
+    #
+    # Without probes, we can still set a break on longjmp, but getting the longjmp
+    # target may not work, in the following cases:
+    # - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target_p (gdbarch) == 0: not implemented.
+    # - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch) == 0: for instance on amd64 if
+    #   tdep->jb_pc_offset == -1.
+    # - gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch) != 0: if we have a glibc with
+    #   pointer mangling ( https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PointerEncryption )
+    #   then we retrieve a mangled longjmp target that needs to be demangled.
+    #   For instance on amd64 with target board unix/-m32.
+    #
+    # Pointer demangling is currently not implemented for any target.
+    # For the amd64 case, this would require copying for instance this:
+    #   48 c1 ca 11             ror    $0x11,%rdx
+    #   64 48 33 14 25 30 00    xor    %fs:0x30,%rdx
+    # into a scratch space, save the register set, set %rdx to the mangled
+    # longjmp target, displaced-step through the two insn and read the
+    # demangled longjmp target from %rdx, and restore the register set.
+    #
+    # The failure mode in the first two cases is that the next degrades into a
+    # continue.  The failure mode in the latter case is a failure to set a
+    # breakpoint (matched by re_cannot_insert_bp) and a stop in longjmp.
+    #
+    # We detect the different failure modes and kfail these.
+
+    set have_longjmp_probe 0
+    gdb_test_multiple "info probes stap libc ^longjmp$" "" {
+	-re -wrap "No probes matched\\." {
+	    pass $gdb_test_name
+	}
+	-re -wrap "\r\nstap\[ \t\]+libc\[ \t\]+longjmp\[ \t\]+.*" {
+	    pass $gdb_test_name
+	    set have_longjmp_probe 1
+	}
     }
-    -re -wrap "\r\nstap\[ \t\]+libc\[ \t\]+longjmp\[ \t\]+.*" {
-	pass $gdb_test_name
-	set have_longjmp_probe 1
+
+    if { $with_probes } {
+	if { !$have_longjmp_probe } {
+	    unsupported "longjmp probe required"
+	    return
+	}
+    } else {
+	gdb_assert { !$have_longjmp_probe }
     }
-}
 
-set bp_miss_step_1 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_1"]
-set bp_miss_step_2 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_2"]
+    set bp_miss_step_1 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_1"]
+    set bp_miss_step_2 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_2"]
 
-set bp_start_test_1 [gdb_get_line_number "patt1"]
-set bp_start_test_2 [gdb_get_line_number "patt2"]
-set bp_start_test_3 [gdb_get_line_number "patt3"]
+    set bp_start_test_1 [gdb_get_line_number "patt1"]
+    set bp_start_test_2 [gdb_get_line_number "patt2"]
+    set bp_start_test_3 [gdb_get_line_number "patt3"]
 
-set re_cannot_insert_bp \
-    [multi_line \
-	 "Warning:" \
-	 "Cannot insert breakpoint $decimal\\." \
-	 "Cannot access memory at address $hex"]
+    set re_cannot_insert_bp \
+	[multi_line \
+	     "Warning:" \
+	     "Cannot insert breakpoint $::decimal\\." \
+	     "Cannot access memory at address $::hex"]
 
-#
-# Pattern 1 - simple longjmp.
-#
+    #
+    # Pattern 1 - simple longjmp.
+    #
 
-with_test_prefix "pattern 1" {
+    with_test_prefix "pattern 1" {
 
-    with_test_prefix setup {
-	delete_breakpoints
+	with_test_prefix setup {
+	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_1" \
-	    "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_1.*" \
-	    "breakpoint at pattern start"
-	gdb_test "continue" "patt1.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
+	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_1" \
+		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_1.*" \
+		"breakpoint at pattern start"
+	    gdb_test "continue" "patt1.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
 
-	# set safe-net break
-	gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \
-	    "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_1.*" \
-	    "breakpoint at safety net"
-    }
+	    # set safe-net break
+	    gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \
+		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_1.*" \
+		"breakpoint at safety net"
+	}
 
-    gdb_test "next" "longjmps\\+\\+;.*" "next over setjmp"
-    gdb_test "next" "longjmp \\(env, 1\\);.*" "next to longjmp"
+	gdb_test "next" "longjmps\\+\\+;.*" "next over setjmp"
+	gdb_test "next" "longjmp \\(env, 1\\);.*" "next to longjmp"
 
-    set msg "next over longjmp"
-    gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
-	-re ".*patt1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    pass $msg
-	    gdb_test "next" "resumes\\+\\+.*" "next into else block"
-	    gdb_test "next" "miss_step_1.*" "next into safety net"
-	}
-	-re "miss_step_1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
-		fail $gdb_test_name
-	    } else {
-		kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+	set msg "next over longjmp"
+	gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
+	    -re ".*patt1.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+		pass $msg
+		gdb_test "next" "resumes\\+\\+.*" "next into else block"
+		gdb_test "next" "miss_step_1.*" "next into safety net"
 	    }
-	}
-	-re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
-	    if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
-		fail $gdb_test_name
-	    } else {
-		kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+	    -re "miss_step_1.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+		if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
+		    fail $gdb_test_name
+		} else {
+		    kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		}
+	    }
+	    -re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
+		if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
+		    fail $gdb_test_name
+		} else {
+		    kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		}
 	    }
 	}
     }
-}
 
-#
-# Pattern 2 - longjmp from an inner function.
-#
+    #
+    # Pattern 2 - longjmp from an inner function.
+    #
 
-with_test_prefix "pattern 2" {
+    with_test_prefix "pattern 2" {
 
-    with_test_prefix setup {
-	delete_breakpoints
+	with_test_prefix setup {
+	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_2" \
-	    "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_2.*" \
-	    "breakpoint at pattern start"
-	gdb_test "continue" "patt2.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
+	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_2" \
+		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_2.*" \
+		"breakpoint at pattern start"
+	    gdb_test "continue" "patt2.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
 
-	# set safe-net break
-	gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \
-	    "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_2.*" \
-	    "breakpoint at safety net"
-    }
+	    # set safe-net break
+	    gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \
+		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_2.*" \
+		"breakpoint at safety net"
+	}
 
-    gdb_test "next" "call_longjmp.*" "next over setjmp"
+	gdb_test "next" "call_longjmp.*" "next over setjmp"
 
-    set msg "next over call_longjmp"
-    gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
-	-re ".*patt2.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    pass $msg
+	set msg "next over call_longjmp"
+	gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
+	    -re ".*patt2.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+		pass $msg
 
-	    gdb_test "next" "resumes\\+\\+.*" "next into else block"
-	    gdb_test "next" "miss_step_2.*" "next into safety net"
-	}
-	-re "miss_step_2.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
-		fail $gdb_test_name
-	    } else {
-		kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		gdb_test "next" "resumes\\+\\+.*" "next into else block"
+		gdb_test "next" "miss_step_2.*" "next into safety net"
 	    }
-	}
-	-re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
-	    if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
-		fail $gdb_test_name
-	    } else {
-		kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+	    -re "miss_step_2.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+		if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
+		    fail $gdb_test_name
+		} else {
+		    kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		}
+	    }
+	    -re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
+		if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
+		    fail $gdb_test_name
+		} else {
+		    kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		}
 	    }
 	}
     }
-}
 
-#
-# Pattern 3 - setjmp/longjmp inside stepped-over function.
-#
+    #
+    # Pattern 3 - setjmp/longjmp inside stepped-over function.
+    #
 
-with_test_prefix "pattern 3" {
+    with_test_prefix "pattern 3" {
 
-    with_test_prefix setup {
-	delete_breakpoints
+	with_test_prefix setup {
+	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \
-	    "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_3.*" \
-	    "breakpoint at pattern start"
-	gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
-    }
-
-    gdb_test_multiple "next" "next over pattern" {
-	-re -wrap "longjmp caught.*" {
-	    pass $gdb_test_name
+	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \
+		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_3.*" \
+		"breakpoint at pattern start"
+	    gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
 	}
-	-re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
-	    if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
-		fail $gdb_test_name
-	    } else {
-		kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+
+	gdb_test_multiple "next" "next over pattern" {
+	    -re -wrap "longjmp caught.*" {
+		pass $gdb_test_name
+	    }
+	    -re -wrap "\r\n$re_cannot_insert_bp\r\n.*" {
+		if { $have_longjmp_probe } {
+		    fail $gdb_test_name
+		} else {
+		    kfail $gdb_test_name "gdb/26967"
+		}
 	    }
 	}
     }
 }
+
+foreach_with_prefix with_probes { 0 1 } {
+    do_test $with_probes
+}

base-commit: 0ab9328277ce12014ce05ff139eba7a6230516fd
-- 
2.35.3


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-08 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-08 12:46 Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-02-08 13:27 ` Luis Machado
2023-02-08 14:48   ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-08 14:51     ` Luis Machado
2023-02-08 15:38       ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-08 18:06         ` Luis Machado
2023-02-08 20:36           ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-09 10:37             ` Luis Machado
2023-02-09 11:58               ` Luis Machado
2023-02-09 12:19                 ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-09 14:34                   ` Luis Machado
2023-02-09 16:44                     ` Luis Machado
2023-02-10 11:09                       ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230208124652.29570-1-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).