public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix linespec ambiguity in gdb.base/longjmp.exp
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:57:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230210105749.2893-1-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)

PR testsuite/30103 reports the following failure on aarch64-linux
(ubuntu 22.04):
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: next to longjmp
next
warning: Breakpoint address adjusted from 0x83dc305fef755015 to \
  0xffdc305fef755015.
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 0.
Cannot access memory at address 0xffdc305fef755015

__libc_siglongjmp (env=0xaaaaaaab1018 <env>, val=1) at ./setjmp/longjmp.c:30
30	}
(gdb) KFAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: gdb/26967 \
  (PRMS: next over longjmp)
delete breakpoints
Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
(gdb) info breakpoints
No breakpoints or watchpoints.
(gdb) break 63
No line 63 in the current file.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: setup: breakpoint \
  at pattern start (got interactive prompt)
...

The test-case intends to set the breakpoint on line number 63 in
gdb.base/longjmp.c.

It tries to do so by specifying "break 63", which specifies a line in the
"current source file".

Due to the KFAIL PR, gdb stopped in __libc_siglongjmp, and because of presence
of debug info, the "current source file" becomes glibc's ./setjmp/longjmp.c.

Consequently, setting the breakpoint fails.

Fix this by adding a $subdir/$srcfile: prefix to the breakpoint linespecs.

I've managed to reproduce the FAIL on x86_64/-m32, by installing the
glibc-32bit-debuginfo package.  This allowed me to confirm the "current source
file" that is used:
...
(gdb) KFAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: gdb/26967 \
  (PRMS: next over longjmp)
info source^M
Current source file is ../setjmp/longjmp.c^M
...

Tested on x86_64-linux, target boards unix/{-m64,-m32}.

Reported-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>

PR testsuite/30103
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30103
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
index 96d9c1c8059..f74891aa7ca 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ proc do_test { with_probes } {
 	gdb_assert { !$have_longjmp_probe }
     }
 
+    # When using these line numbers in break linespecs, prefix each of these
+    # with "$subdir/$srcfile:" to avoid referring to a glibc file when stopped
+    # in __libc_siglongjmp or similar.
     set bp_miss_step_1 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_1"]
     set bp_miss_step_2 [gdb_get_line_number "miss_step_2"]
 
@@ -104,13 +107,13 @@ proc do_test { with_probes } {
 	with_test_prefix setup {
 	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_1" \
+	    gdb_test "break $::subdir/$::srcfile:$bp_start_test_1" \
 		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_1.*" \
 		"breakpoint at pattern start"
 	    gdb_test "continue" "patt1.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
 
 	    # set safe-net break
-	    gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \
+	    gdb_test "break $::subdir/$::srcfile:$bp_miss_step_1" \
 		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_1.*" \
 		"breakpoint at safety net"
 	}
@@ -151,13 +154,13 @@ proc do_test { with_probes } {
 	with_test_prefix setup {
 	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_2" \
+	    gdb_test "break $::subdir/$::srcfile:$bp_start_test_2" \
 		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_2.*" \
 		"breakpoint at pattern start"
 	    gdb_test "continue" "patt2.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"
 
 	    # set safe-net break
-	    gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \
+	    gdb_test "break $::subdir/$::srcfile:$bp_miss_step_2" \
 		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_miss_step_2.*" \
 		"breakpoint at safety net"
 	}
@@ -198,7 +201,7 @@ proc do_test { with_probes } {
 	with_test_prefix setup {
 	    delete_breakpoints
 
-	    gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \
+	    gdb_test "break $::subdir/$::srcfile:$bp_start_test_3" \
 		"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$::srcfile, line.*$bp_start_test_3.*" \
 		"breakpoint at pattern start"
 	    gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern start"

base-commit: fe8cdc8ec145a166414fc375cf2cb65d9a8085a1
-- 
2.35.3


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 10:57 Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-02-10 14:36 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-10 14:58 ` Luis Machado
2023-02-10 15:00   ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230210105749.2893-1-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).