public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [pushed 4/5] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp for remote host
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:38:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230315153837.21440-5-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230315153837.21440-1-tdevries@suse.de>

With test-case gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp and host board
local-remote-host-notty and target board native-gdbserver I run into:
...
(gdb) break -pstap three_arg^M
No probe matching objfile=`<any>', provider=`<any>', name=`three_arg'^M
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp: probe: three_arg: \
  gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at -pstap three_arg
...
due to compiling two executables with the same name, and when uploading the
second one from host to build, we run into:
...
Upload from 127.0.0.1 failed, \
  $outputs/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands/amd64-stap-special-operands: \
  Text file busy.
...

Fix this by making the executable names unique.

Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp
index 147d0ff40b2..4773074ce3c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ proc test_probe { probe_name } {
 
 standard_testfile amd64-stap-triplet.S
 
-if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } {
+if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile-triplet $srcfile] } {
     return -1
 }
 
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ test_probe "triplet"
 
 standard_testfile amd64-stap-three-arg-disp.S
 
-if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } {
+if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile-three-arg-displ \
+	  $srcfile] } {
     return -1
 }
 
-- 
2.35.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15 15:38 [pushed 0/5] [gdb/testsuite] Fix remote host issues in gdb.arch tests Tom de Vries
2023-03-15 15:38 ` [pushed 1/5] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/amd64*.exp with local-remote-host-native.exp Tom de Vries
2023-03-15 15:38 ` [pushed 2/5] [gdb/testsuite] Unset DEBUGINFOD_URLS on remote host Tom de Vries
2023-03-15 15:38 ` [pushed 3/5] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp for native-gdbserver Tom de Vries
2023-03-15 15:38 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-03-15 15:38 ` [pushed 5/5] [gdb/testsuite] Fix re-used exec in gdb.arch/ftrace-insn-reloc.exp Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230315153837.21440-5-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).