From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2BD3858D20 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:03:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0B2BD3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1682100231; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rXom7f8ee/UawRqAz4civieIvDqBIoQZSAoBvlMsK7s=; b=i2EoBrhMZw4bzMSD7HFuUL0sAVWsnmweeGuWXGueWlQskkvYI0qatbSHcFWmvLMZh5nnUw GSi0AmycXVF2XZ8zj9ESwVAoHaeOKNNhuDeJKiKZa10MvRypM+L4kBiFNQ1g1DCvZ56QmF wN4V7MOhIc0HxafyONhfIxoemnytB94= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-5-pbMK8m6cPueyuea8ncgy1w-1; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 14:03:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pbMK8m6cPueyuea8ncgy1w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A5A800B35; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f37-zws-nv (unknown [10.2.16.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DDFC1121318; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:03:46 -0700 From: Kevin Buettner To: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Cc: Tom de Vries , WANG Rui Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: Fix false match issue in skip_prologue_using_linetable Message-ID: <20230421110346.7ca9b163@f37-zws-nv> In-Reply-To: <1a4148e1-1376-3bc6-e398-4c611922c58f@suse.de> References: <20230418120939.29102-1-tdevries@suse.de> <1a4148e1-1376-3bc6-e398-4c611922c58f@suse.de> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Tom, On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:15:06 +0200 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: > On 4/18/23 14:09, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: > > Co-Authored-By: WANG Rui (fix, tiny change [1]) > > Co-Authored-By: Tom de Vries (test-case) > > > > [1] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html > > I'm not used to deal with these matters, so I'd appreciate some > review/approval on this. Is my copyright status assessment correct, and > did I write it up correctly? I refreshed my memory via the link you provided above. Based on what is written there, I conclude that Wang Rui's change is not legally signficant for copyright purposes. Also, I've looked over the Rui's patch as well as your test case, and it looks good to me. So... Approved-by: Kevin Buettner