public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook
@ 2024-02-06 18:22 Ciaran Woodward
  2024-02-06 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
  2024-02-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciaran Woodward
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran Woodward @ 2024-02-06 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: tom, Aditya.Kamath1, Ciaran Woodward

The warning_hook_handler function pointer takes va_list as
an argument, which on some platforms (mingw64) includes some
attributes. Attributes get ignored in template arguments.
This led to the compiler warning:

error: ignoring attributes on template argument 'warning_hook_handler' {aka 'void (*)(const char*, char*)'} [-Werror=ignored-attributes]
  387 |   scoped_restore_tmpl<warning_hook_handler> m_save;
      |                                           ^

By manually implementing the save/restore behaviour, rather
than using the helper template, this warning is fixed.

---
This is a result of the discussion here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-February/206374.html

 gdb/utils.c |  9 ++++++++-
 gdb/utils.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
index 702c3f15826..40b998d6288 100644
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -145,8 +145,15 @@ get_warning_hook_handler ()
 
 scoped_restore_warning_hook::scoped_restore_warning_hook
      (warning_hook_handler new_handler)
-       : m_save (make_scoped_restore (&warning_hook, new_handler))
+       : m_save (warning_hook)
 {
+  warning_hook = new_handler;
+}
+
+scoped_restore_warning_hook::~scoped_restore_warning_hook ()
+{
+  if (!m_moved)
+    warning_hook = m_save;
 }
 
 /* Print a warning message.  The first argument STRING is the warning
diff --git a/gdb/utils.h b/gdb/utils.h
index 7487590902a..d3b8efa56cb 100644
--- a/gdb/utils.h
+++ b/gdb/utils.h
@@ -383,8 +383,21 @@ class scoped_restore_warning_hook
 public:
   explicit scoped_restore_warning_hook (warning_hook_handler new_handler);
 
+  scoped_restore_warning_hook (scoped_restore_warning_hook &other)
+    : m_save (other.m_save),
+      m_moved (other.m_moved)
+  {
+    other.m_moved = true;
+  }
+
+  ~scoped_restore_warning_hook ();
+
 private:
-  scoped_restore_tmpl<warning_hook_handler> m_save;
+  scoped_restore_warning_hook &operator= (const scoped_restore_warning_hook &)
+    = delete;
+
+  warning_hook_handler m_save;
+  bool m_moved = false;
 };
 
 /* Return the current warning handler.  */
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook
  2024-02-06 18:22 [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook Ciaran Woodward
@ 2024-02-06 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
  2024-02-07 11:18   ` Ciaran Woodward
  2024-02-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciaran Woodward
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2024-02-06 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ciaran Woodward; +Cc: gdb-patches, tom, Aditya.Kamath1

>>>>> "Ciaran" == Ciaran Woodward <ciaranwoodward@xmos.com> writes:

Ciaran> By manually implementing the save/restore behaviour, rather
Ciaran> than using the helper template, this warning is fixed.

Thank you.

Ciaran> +  warning_hook_handler m_save;
Ciaran> +  bool m_moved = false;

Can we just delete the move constructor?

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook
  2024-02-06 18:22 [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook Ciaran Woodward
  2024-02-06 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2024-02-07 11:17 ` Ciaran Woodward
  2024-02-07 15:44   ` Tom Tromey
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran Woodward @ 2024-02-07 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: tom, Ciaran Woodward

The warning_hook_handler function pointer takes va_list as
an argument, which on some platforms (mingw64) includes some
attributes. Attributes get ignored in template arguments.
This led to the compiler warning:

error: ignoring attributes on template argument 'warning_hook_handler' {aka 'void (*)(const char*, char*)'} [-Werror=ignored-attributes]
  387 |   scoped_restore_tmpl<warning_hook_handler> m_save;
      |                                           ^

By manually implementing the save/restore behaviour, rather
than using the helper template, this warning is fixed.
---
 gdb/utils.c | 8 +++++++-
 gdb/utils.h | 9 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
index 702c3f15826..a1aeb1025fa 100644
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -145,8 +145,14 @@ get_warning_hook_handler ()
 
 scoped_restore_warning_hook::scoped_restore_warning_hook
      (warning_hook_handler new_handler)
-       : m_save (make_scoped_restore (&warning_hook, new_handler))
+       : m_save (warning_hook)
 {
+  warning_hook = new_handler;
+}
+
+scoped_restore_warning_hook::~scoped_restore_warning_hook ()
+{
+  warning_hook = m_save;
 }
 
 /* Print a warning message.  The first argument STRING is the warning
diff --git a/gdb/utils.h b/gdb/utils.h
index 7487590902a..2acd1fc4624 100644
--- a/gdb/utils.h
+++ b/gdb/utils.h
@@ -383,8 +383,15 @@ class scoped_restore_warning_hook
 public:
   explicit scoped_restore_warning_hook (warning_hook_handler new_handler);
 
+  ~scoped_restore_warning_hook ();
+
 private:
-  scoped_restore_tmpl<warning_hook_handler> m_save;
+  scoped_restore_warning_hook (const scoped_restore_warning_hook &other)
+    = delete;
+  scoped_restore_warning_hook &operator= (const scoped_restore_warning_hook &)
+    = delete;
+
+  warning_hook_handler m_save;
 };
 
 /* Return the current warning handler.  */
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook
  2024-02-06 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2024-02-07 11:18   ` Ciaran Woodward
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran Woodward @ 2024-02-07 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches, Aditya.Kamath1

 
> Can we just delete the move constructor?

Yes, done in v2 (sent to list)

Cheers,
Ciaran

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook
  2024-02-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciaran Woodward
@ 2024-02-07 15:44   ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2024-02-07 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ciaran Woodward; +Cc: gdb-patches, tom

>>>>> "Ciaran" == Ciaran Woodward <ciaranwoodward@xmos.com> writes:

Ciaran> The warning_hook_handler function pointer takes va_list as
Ciaran> an argument, which on some platforms (mingw64) includes some
Ciaran> attributes. Attributes get ignored in template arguments.
Ciaran> This led to the compiler warning:

Thanks for the patch.  This is ok.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-07 15:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-06 18:22 [PATCH] Remove use of scoped_restore_tmpl from scoped_restore_warning_hook Ciaran Woodward
2024-02-06 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
2024-02-07 11:18   ` Ciaran Woodward
2024-02-07 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciaran Woodward
2024-02-07 15:44   ` Tom Tromey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).