From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix attaching to process when it has zombie threads
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:11:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240321231149.519549-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> (raw)
Hello,
This patch series fixes a GDB hang when attaching to a multi-threaded
inferior which happens often (but not always) on aarch64-linux and
powerpc64le-linux, as described in PR 31312. See patch 3 for a detailed
descripiton of the problem.
Patches 1 and 2 are preparatory patches because I want to use existing code
to parse the /proc/PID/stat file to get the thread's starttime value, so
that GDB and gdbserver aren't fooled by PID reuse.
This patch series was tested on native and extended-remote aarch64-linux
and armv8l-linux-gnueabihf and no regressions were found, except for the
following:
When running gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp on armv8l-linux-gnueabihf
extended-remote, sometimes GDBserver dies with:
builtin_spawn /home/thiago.bauermann/.cache/builds/gdb-native-aarch32/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/detach-step-over/detach-step-over
Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1, port 56624
Process /home/thiago.bauermann/.cache/builds/gdb-native-aarch32/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/detach-step-over/detach-step-over created; pid = 840876
Attached; pid = 840821
Detaching from process 840821
Attached; pid = 840821
/home/thiago.bauermann/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:1956: A problem internal to GDBserver has been detected.
unsuspend LWP 840821, suspended=-1
The assertion triggered is this one:
/* Decrement LWP's suspend count. */
static void
lwp_suspended_decr (struct lwp_info *lwp)
{
lwp->suspended--;
if (lwp->suspended < 0)
{
struct thread_info *thread = get_lwp_thread (lwp);
internal_error ("unsuspend LWP %ld, suspended=%d\n", lwpid_of (thread),
lwp->suspended);
}
}
Unfortunately for the moment I don't have time to further debug this
problem and I didn't want to keep sitting on these patches until I can come
back to this issue.
Note that of all the testcases in the GDB testsuite, only
detach-step-over.exp triggers the GDBserver internal error so it's a
localized problem.
This is why I'm posting the patch series as an RFC. Considering that it
fixes a problem that is causing instability in the testsuite results for
aarch64-linux and powerpc64le-linux, does it make sense to commit it as is,
and then investigate the GDBserver internal error on armv8l-linux-gnueabihf
later?
Thiago Jung Bauermann (3):
gdb/nat: Use procfs(5) indexes in linux_common_core_of_thread
gdb/nat: Factor linux_find_proc_stat_field out of
linux_common_core_of_thread
gdb/nat/linux: Fix attaching to process when it has zombie threads
gdb/nat/linux-osdata.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
gdb/nat/linux-osdata.h | 7 +++++
gdb/nat/linux-procfs.c | 19 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
base-commit: b42aa684f6ff2bce9b8bc58aa89574723f17f1ce
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 23:11 Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2024-03-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] gdb/nat: Use procfs(5) indexes in linux_common_core_of_thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-22 17:33 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-17 15:55 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-20 5:15 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] gdb/nat: Factor linux_find_proc_stat_field out of linux_common_core_of_thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-22 16:12 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-17 16:06 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-20 5:16 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] gdb/nat/linux: Fix attaching to process when it has zombie threads Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-22 16:19 ` Luis Machado
2024-03-22 16:52 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-16 4:48 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-17 15:32 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-20 5:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-26 15:35 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-17 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-20 5:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-22 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] " Christophe Lyon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240321231149.519549-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).