From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127922 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2017 17:07:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127678 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2017 17:07:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:c-73-23, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:c-73-23, H*RU:sk:c-73-23 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail.baldwin.cx Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (HELO mail.baldwin.cx) (96.47.65.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:07:25 +0000 Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6999610A8BA; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:07:23 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Initial support for FreeBSD/arm in GDB Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <2173372.a2VOFH3vbK@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7e4549c3-4ef3-fef8-769e-efdf0e3c3a6f@redhat.com> References: <20170922225713.26609-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <2102789.4VvdLC0lsm@ralph.baldwin.cx> <7e4549c3-4ef3-fef8-769e-efdf0e3c3a6f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:14:39 PM Pedro Alves wrote: > On 09/29/2017 06:45 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Ping? > > > > Alan Modra has reviewed the binutils bits, and Eli signed off on the NEWS > > change in V1. > > > > Sorry, missed that there was a v2. In any case, same comment apply, > and the GDB changes look good to me. > > I didn't mention explicitly, but just in case the configure.tgt > hunk still applies / builds as is: please be sure to update the > gdb/configure.tgt changes to follow the recent change that > split the cpu and os objects to separate switches. Yes, I've already updated for that locally. I'll work on pulling in the other fixes as well. -- John Baldwin