From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2433858D1E for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:15:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6B2433858D1E Received: from [172.16.0.64] (192-222-180-24.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.180.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 635FB1E13B; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2a97ff52-3938-442a-fd44-6d991a21022e@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:15:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Update mailing list address Content-Language: fr To: Tsukasa OI , Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <80bd8d2e1056f04bd1347a9bbcaaf1d0cd847b24.1661566296.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> <87k06pa755.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:15:49 -0000 On 9/1/22 03:42, Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches wrote: > On 2022/08/31 4:00, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>> Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches writes: >> >>> The commit bf1102165389 "* MAINTAINERS: Perform some obvious fixups." >>> back in 2009 changed the mailing list address gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com >>> to gdb-patches@sourceware.org. >> >>> This commit does the same to sim/MAINTAINERS. >> >> Thanks. I think this could go in under the "obvious" rule. >> >> Tom >> > > Thanks for letting me know. > > But is this mean... can I just wait or do I need to resubmit as [OB > PATCH]? (in general) > > Tsukasa Hi, Tom meant that the patch was OK to push, and that in his opinion you could have pushed it directly, since it was obvious. However, you might not have push access, is that right? In any case, I pushed the patch for you. Simon