From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4004A383F842 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:13:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4004A383F842 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97FE81E79B; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:13:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] [gdb/testsuite] use args as lib list for jit-elf tests To: "Strasuns, Mihails" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <167782> <20200511102855.4987-1-mihails.strasuns@intel.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <2baf41dc-717b-e81e-ebe3-084c229da68c@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:13:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 14:13:33 -0000 On 2020-05-12 3:51 a.m., Strasuns, Mihails wrote: > Fixed nits for the series and pushed. Thank you for your patience! Thanks for _your_ patience, this has taken a while because of me, thanks for pushing through. If I recall, the initial goal of this was to fix some JIT bug in GDB itself, and these test refactorings were to make it possible to write a test for that? Simon