public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Sporadic failures of selftest tests
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30d4dc25-a59b-1196-3bc3-c8b982191ec0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017154758.DD85FD807C2@oc3748833570.ibm.com>

On 10/17/2017 04:47 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:

> But what confuses me is that in a normal build, GDB by default gets
> built with -O2 for me, so I'm wondering why you had to use special
> CXXFLAGS above.  

Ah, sorry for not being clearer.  The build tree that I'm using is
configure with explicit CXXFLAGS="-g3 -O0", and so I had to use CXXFLAGS
to override what I had configured with.

> Also, I'm wondering why I'm only seeing this now,
> when this has apparently been broken all the time.  Just some random
> timing issues that are now different for some reason?

Commit bf4692711232 ("Eliminate catch_errors") also did this:

 @@ -1145,7 +1142,15 @@ captured_main (void *data)
       change - SET_TOP_LEVEL() - has been eliminated.  */
    while (1)
      {
 -      catch_errors (captured_command_loop, 0, "", RETURN_MASK_ALL);
 +      TRY
 +       {
 +         captured_command_loop ();
 +       }
 +      CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ALL)
 +       {
 +         exception_print (gdb_stderr, ex);
 +       }
 +      END_CATCH
      }
 
So most probably before that commit captured_command_loop
wasn't inlined in captured main (unless LTO, maybe).

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-17 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17 14:00 Ulrich Weigand
2017-10-17 14:25 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 14:34   ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 14:40     ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 14:55       ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 15:48         ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-10-17 15:54           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-10-17 16:12             ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-20 12:51               ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-10-20 14:32                 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30d4dc25-a59b-1196-3bc3-c8b982191ec0@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).