From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9129E3858D28 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 21:51:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9129E3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.64] (192-222-180-24.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.180.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F66C1E110; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:51:33 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1673041893; bh=xVR4PJhMO/kPQNvqWaVSm29RVZTuSR2T8FqbUiML8DY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=vVYBQYQY/39wxXVnePVVWFRzSrDJUv3o7AM7Ebj/VNWIYejhN6Bqygn1ASyw+mhNJ 0uueG9g9T9LnMTLlbGjR2UMpnVnckoamB4NJyO8ogaq33bXGHI+9vr7dTZ2YvsjoLQ PHJmnB/FX0k8rFXDNRstnc6Sz0yKVl99W/T/mw4A= Message-ID: <37f151c2-df09-b594-b29b-ff460df9038e@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:51:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle range types in ax-gdb.c Content-Language: fr To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20230104164452.1154744-1-tromey@adacore.com> <20230104164452.1154744-3-tromey@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20230104164452.1154744-3-tromey@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 1/4/23 11:44, Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches wrote: > A range type can usually be treated the same as its underlying integer > type, at least for the purposes of agent expressions. This patch > arranges for range types to be handled this way in ax-gdb.c, letting a > somewhat larger subset of Ada expressions be compiled. Instead of stripping the range type at many places (possibly forgetting some), I wonder if this could be done systematically before, when we build the axs_values. Simon