From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/arm: Sync sp with other *sp registers
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:34:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a4bec66-7031-74ad-f7f4-d70af5dfe725@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220630071329.GA28593@gnbcxd0114.gnb.st.com>
Hi,
On 6/30/22 08:13, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For Arm Cortex-M33 with security extensions, there are 4 different
> stack pointers (msp_s, msp_ns, psp_s, psp_ns), without security
> extensions and for other Cortex-M targets, there are 2 different
> stack pointers (msp and psp).
>
> This patch allows arch dependent unwinding override register values
> for registers not covered by the DWARF data. That means that sp
> will always be in sync with one of the real stack pointers on
> Arm targets that contains more than one stack pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
> ---
> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> gdb/dwarf2/frame.h | 9 +++++
> 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> index 3a1b52c2380..48711cb2a65 100644
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -4956,6 +4956,98 @@ arm_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
> }
> }
>
> +/* Return the value of the unspecified register REGNUM for THIS_FRAME. */
> +
> +static struct value *
> +arm_dwarf2_frame_prev_unspecified_reg (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> + int regnum)
> +{
> + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
> + arm_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = (arm_gdbarch_tdep *) gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
> + bool override_with_sp_value = false;
> +
> + if (tdep->have_sec_ext)
> + {
> + CORE_ADDR sp, msp_s, msp_ns, psp_s, psp_ns;
> + sp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
> + msp_s = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum);
> + msp_ns = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum);
> + psp_s = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum);
> + psp_ns = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum);
> +
> + if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum && (msp_s == sp || msp_ns == sp))
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for MSP register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum && msp_s == sp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for MSP_S register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum && msp_ns == sp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for MSP_NS register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum && (psp_s == sp
> + || psp_ns == sp))
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for PSP register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum && psp_s == sp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for PSP_S register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum && psp_ns == sp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for PSP_NS register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + }
> + else if (tdep->is_m)
> + {
> + CORE_ADDR sp, msp, psp;
> + sp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
> + msp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum);
> + psp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> + tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum);
> +
> + if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum && sp == msp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for MSP register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + else if (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum && sp == psp)
> + {
> + /* Use value of SP for PSP register. */
> + override_with_sp_value = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (override_with_sp_value)
> + {
> + CORE_ADDR prev_sp;
> + struct frame_info *prev_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
> + if (prev_frame)
> + prev_sp = get_frame_register_unsigned (prev_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
> + else
> + prev_sp = get_frame_base (this_frame);
> +
> + return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, prev_sp);
> + }
> +
> + /* Don't know how to fetch this value, use generic method. */
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /* Given BUF, which is OLD_LEN bytes ending at ENDADDR, expand
> the buffer to be NEW_LEN bytes ending at ENDADDR. Return
> NULL if an error occurs. BUF is freed. */
> @@ -10438,6 +10530,8 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
> gdbarch_init_osabi (info, gdbarch);
>
> dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg (gdbarch, arm_dwarf2_frame_init_reg);
> + dwarf2_frame_set_prev_unspecified_reg (gdbarch,
> + arm_dwarf2_frame_prev_unspecified_reg);
>
> /* Add some default predicates. */
> if (is_m)
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> index 5878d72f922..c4b15b2d240 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> @@ -595,6 +595,10 @@ struct dwarf2_frame_ops
> /* Convert .eh_frame register number to DWARF register number, or
> adjust .debug_frame register number. */
> int (*adjust_regnum) (struct gdbarch *, int, int);
> +
> + /* Return the value of the unspecified register REGNUM for THIS_FRAME. */
> + struct value * (*prev_unspecified_reg) (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> + int regnum);
> };
>
> /* Default architecture-specific register state initialization
> @@ -677,6 +681,50 @@ dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
> ops->init_reg (gdbarch, regnum, reg, this_frame);
> }
>
> +/* Set the architecture-specific unspecified register unwinding
> + function for GDBARCH to PREV_UNSPECIFIED_REG. */
> +
> +void
> +dwarf2_frame_set_prev_unspecified_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> + struct value * (*prev_unspecified_reg)
> + (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> + int regnum))
> +{
> + struct dwarf2_frame_ops *ops
> + = (struct dwarf2_frame_ops *) gdbarch_data (gdbarch, dwarf2_frame_data);
> +
> + ops->prev_unspecified_reg = prev_unspecified_reg;
> +}
I'm wondering if we really need to introduce a hook here. I understand we may need to sidestep the dwarf unwinder
to do custom handling of the msp*/psp* registers, but wouldn't we be able to achieve the same with the existing
dwarf hooks?
For example, we could register a hook with dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg (), like aarch64 (see gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:aarch64_dwarf2_frame_init_reg).
With such a hook, we could define our own rules for individual registers through DWARF2_FRAME_REG_FN.
Would that work?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 7:13 Yvan Roux
2022-07-06 12:34 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2022-07-07 9:11 ` Yvan Roux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a4bec66-7031-74ad-f7f4-d70af5dfe725@arm.com \
--to=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com \
--cc=yvan.roux@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).