From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100673 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2018 19:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 100662 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2018 19:47:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=benson X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 19:47:09 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC5FC1E073; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:47:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] infrun: step through indirect branch thunks To: Simon Marchi , Gary Benson , "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1519017382-24335-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <4dfab882-016f-01b5-bb28-67cd6637acea@redhat.com> <20180413145827.GA29459@blade.nx> <1ed31a6b-bca3-b3ea-c7d9-2d8588c295c1@ericsson.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <3b0a79d5-88f3-0ae8-0d8d-4faf5434580f@simark.ca> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 19:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1ed31a6b-bca3-b3ea-c7d9-2d8588c295c1@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 On 2018-04-13 12:06 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2018-04-13 10:58 AM, Gary Benson wrote: >> This is with a clean build on x86_64 RHEL 7.4, >> CFLAGS="-g -O0" CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" ./configure --with-separate-debug-dir=/usr/lib/debug --enable-targets=all >> >> Is anyone else seeing this or is it just me? >> >> Thanks, >> Gary > > Is x86-tdep.o built and included in the link command (make V=1)? > > Simon > Ok, so actually this happened with _not_ using --enable-targets=all. I just pushed a patch which should fix it: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=eda4efb12763893b8a49c10c6f2823a465c1c6ba Simon