From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45194 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2016 14:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45163 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2016 14:30:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=BTC, btc, super X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:30:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE562549; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9SEUNIK019738; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:30:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add support for choosing disassembler cpu in GDB for POWER. To: Peter Bergner , Ulrich Weigand References: <20161012082525.3250910FDC3@oc8523832656.ibm.com> <88940498-822b-b192-b983-d8571a81ad87@redhat.com> <2c62687d-f013-5af8-96ae-d7f56d28c218@redhat.com> <4f8959a7-33b9-385c-3c63-2d5b26286579@vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alan Modra , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <3b814d5e-f716-f1c7-1530-684901b28e30@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f8959a7-33b9-385c-3c63-2d5b26286579@vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00808.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2016 03:24 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 10/28/16 9:10 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Maybe not. Where are the per-arch settings stored? > > They're stored in the gdbarch... You mean, as a new string member of gdbarch? That sounds problematic, since you can have multiple different gdbarch instances for the same architecture live at the same time. BTC, I'm talking about where does the FOO in "set disassembler-options FOO" end up stored. > >> Maybe it doesn't even make sense to consider this >> setting per-arch. Maybe per-inferior would be better. > > I have no idea how to do that, so I think I'll stick with > a per-arch setting and maybe down the line, someone can > extend it to that. That's super fine with me. Thanks, Pedro Alves