From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DF43858D28 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 16:39:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 01DF43858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.170] (unknown [167.248.160.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1D3A1E0D4; Mon, 1 May 2023 12:39:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1682959190; bh=EFTS+zzvdFHDjQcxaiJaBI+naC4neUOt6SkD4BiovE0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=cuUdAzwfuJmD2ibRm9M4h8mMm3Kcr9sJ+lRPIJb68Ftxv8GnEj4JApFtACVGveUOL Gne0OG4hJC9rrzyj6BDZrF0wYhU1rOJTO6+ZUYj8BCVsnqty+zC2aQN9wx/oFNpWbc TA74WqH/2BAzB3I2Kxs7sGQNniCpRleuGN3sS6XQ= Message-ID: <3bf501c7-1395-7c6b-6281-feaa79c5eb36@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 12:39:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Subject: Re: GDB 13.2 and GDB 14 releases... Content-Language: fr To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <945cb511-3bd0-7004-caa7-9f0deb76e766@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 5/1/23 10:58, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi Simon, > >> IMO, it's better to make regular releases than waiting to have a certain >> amount of changes. The changes currently in master might not look >> important to me, but maybe someone else is eagerly waiting for a >> specific fix or feature to be officially released. > > Thanks for the suggestion. That makes sense too. Do people want us > to switch to this kind of approach? > I think what you are already doing (roughly every 6 months) is good. I'm just saying that it's fine to release even if there's not an overwhelming amount of new stuff. Simon