public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: kevinb@redhat.com,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] libthread_db initialization changes related to upcoming glibc-2.34
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:35:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c561eb-2676-4b8a-0bc0-d924e7d7ae74@redhat.com> (raw)

This looks good to me.

I've tested on x86_64 Fedora Rawhide.

Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>

> This commit makes some adjustments to accomodate the upcoming
> glibc-2.34 release.  Beginning with glibc-2.34, functionality formerly
> contained in libpthread has been moved to libc.  For the time being,
> libpthread.so still exists in the file system, but it won't show up in
> ldd output and therefore won't be able to trigger initialization of
> libthread_db related code.  E.g...
> 
> Fedora 34 / glibc-2.33.9000:
> 
> [kev@f34-2 gdb]$ ldd testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/tls/tls
> 	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffcf94fa000)
> 	libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007ff0ba9af000)
> 	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007ff0ba8d4000)
> 	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007ff0ba8b9000)
> 	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff0ba6c6000)
> 	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff0babf0000)
> 
> Fedora 34 / glibc-2.33:
> 
> [kev@f34-1 gdb]$ ldd testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/tls/tls
> 	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff32dc0000)
> 	libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f815f6de000)
> 	libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f815f4bf000)
> 	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f815f37b000)
> 	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f815f360000)
> 	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f815f191000)
> 	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f815f721000)
> 
> Note that libpthread is missing from the ldd output for the
> glibc-2.33.9000 machine.
> 
> This means that (unless we happen to think of some entirely different
> mechanism), we'll now need to potentially match "libc" in addition to
> "libpthread" as libraries which might be thread libraries.  This
> accounts for the change made in solib.c.  Note that the new code
> attempts to match "/libc." via strstr().  That trailing dot (".")
> avoids inadvertently matching libraries such as libcrypt (and
> all the other many libraries which begin with "libc").

This is correct and the solution looks good.

You do need to trigger libthread_db loading for libc.so.6 now.

> To avoid attempts to load libthread_db when encountering older
> versions of libc, we now attempt to find "pthread_create" (which is a
> symbol that we'd expect to be in any pthread library) in the
> associated objfile.  This accounts for the changes in
> linux-thread-db.c.

That is a good heuristic.

> I think that other small adjustments will need to be made elsewhere
> too.  I've been working through regressions on my glibc-2.33.9000
> machine; I've fixed some fairly "obvious" changes in the testsuite
> (which are in other commits).  For the rest, it's not yet clear to me
> whether the handful of remaining failures represent a problem in glibc
> or gdb.  I'm still investigating, however, I'll note that these are
> problems that I only see on my glibc-2.33.9000 machine.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* solib.c (libpthread_name_p): Match "libc" in addition
> 	to "libpthread".
> 	* linux-thread-db.c (libpthread_objfile_p): New function.
> 	(libpthread_name_p): Adjust preexisting callers to use
> 	libpthread_objfile_p().
> ---
>  gdb/linux-thread-db.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  gdb/solib.c           | 10 ++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/linux-thread-db.c b/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
> index d1e8c22ac96..5b4e5a8654f 100644
> --- a/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
> @@ -799,6 +799,24 @@ check_thread_db (struct thread_db_info *info, bool log_progress)
>    return test_passed;
>  }
>  
> +/* Predicate which tests whether objfile OBJ refers to the library
> +   containing pthread related symbols.  Historically, this library has
> +   been named in such a way that looking for "libpthread" in the name
> +   was sufficient to identify it.  As of glibc-2.34, the C library
> +   (libc) contains the thread library symbols.  Therefore we check
> +   that the name matches a possible thread library, but we also check
> +   that it contains at least one of the symbols (pthread_create) that
> +   we'd expect to find in the thread library.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +libpthread_objfile_p (objfile *obj)
> +{
> +  return (libpthread_name_p (objfile_name (obj))
> +          && lookup_minimal_symbol ("pthread_create",
> +	                            NULL,
> +				    obj).minsym != NULL);
> +}

OK. If the loaded file matches the name list then do a global symbol
search to see if pthread_create is present and if it is then we will
indirectly trigger an attempt to load libthread_db.

> +
>  /* Attempt to initialize dlopen()ed libthread_db, described by INFO.
>     Return true on success.
>     Failure could happen if libthread_db does not have symbols we expect,
> @@ -1072,7 +1090,7 @@ try_thread_db_load_from_pdir (const char *subdir)
>      return false;
>  
>    for (objfile *obj : current_program_space->objfiles ())
> -    if (libpthread_name_p (objfile_name (obj)))
> +    if (libpthread_objfile_p (obj))

OK.

>        {
>  	if (try_thread_db_load_from_pdir_1 (obj, subdir))
>  	  return true;
> @@ -1181,7 +1199,7 @@ static bool
>  has_libpthread (void)
>  {
>    for (objfile *obj : current_program_space->objfiles ())
> -    if (libpthread_name_p (objfile_name (obj)))
> +    if (libpthread_objfile_p (obj))

OK.

>        return true;
>  
>    return false;
> @@ -1286,7 +1304,7 @@ thread_db_new_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
>  	 of the list of shared libraries to load, and in an app of several
>  	 thousand shared libraries, this can otherwise be painful.  */
>        && ((objfile->flags & OBJF_MAINLINE) != 0
> -	  || libpthread_name_p (objfile_name (objfile))))
> +	  || libpthread_objfile_p (objfile)))

OK.

>      check_for_thread_db ();
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/gdb/solib.c b/gdb/solib.c
> index 2df52118143..88b201ff6a0 100644
> --- a/gdb/solib.c
> +++ b/gdb/solib.c
> @@ -900,12 +900,18 @@ Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" or \"set sysroot\"?"),
>  
>     Uses a fairly simplistic heuristic approach where we check
>     the file name against "/libpthread".  This can lead to false
> -   positives, but this should be good enough in practice.  */
> +   positives, but this should be good enough in practice.
> +
> +   In glibc-2.34 (and later), functions formerly residing
> +   in libpthread have been moved to libc, so "/libc." needs
> +   to be checked too.  (Matching the "." will avoid matching
> +   libraries such as libcrypt.)  */
>  
>  bool
>  libpthread_name_p (const char *name)
>  {
> -  return (strstr (name, "/libpthread") != NULL);
> +  return (strstr (name, "/libpthread") != NULL
> +          || strstr (name, "/libc.") != NULL );

OK. So you look for both libpthread.* and libc.*.

>  }
>  
>  /* Return non-zero if SO is the libpthread shared library.  */
> -- 
> 2.31.1


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 16:35 Carlos O'Donell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-10 17:26 [PATCH 0/4] " Kevin Buettner
2021-06-10 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Kevin Buettner
2021-06-11 19:10   ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-11 21:24     ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44c561eb-2676-4b8a-0bc0-d924e7d7ae74@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).