From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129513 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2017 04:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129502 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2017 04:54:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:54:04 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-251-162.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.251.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268D01E51A; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:54:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] python doc: Rework Breakpoint.__init__ doc To: Eli Zaretskii , Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1512681799-12535-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <83fu8lwbpa.fsf@gnu.org> <34fa897a804e9427dbe8ae3c107638e2@polymtl.ca> <83vahhuhqo.fsf@gnu.org> <52711e30-004e-3a2c-d77c-e409a1f66d9e@ericsson.com> <83o9n8uxbc.fsf@gnu.org> <0e10cff7-b290-115e-ab68-cfa99916eebf@ericsson.com> <83shcfuwp8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <45202103-7dbe-b204-adbe-c84aa1200b66@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83shcfuwp8.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 On 2017-12-12 10:35 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> CC: >> From: Simon Marchi >> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:16:13 -0500 >> >> Do you have any comments on v2? > > Did it change anything wrt the version I reviewed? > Yes, sorry I should have pointed out what's new in that version. I essentially addressed your comments. I added some cross-references and integrated your suggestions of wording. Thanks, Simon