From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54334 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2017 00:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 50836 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2017 00:00:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:352 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 23:59:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A89D85363; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v11NxtSk005287; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:59:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Add back gdb_pretty_print_insn To: Simon Marchi References: <1485909045-30285-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1485909045-30285-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <4930d51bf36a1182279d972150bce661@polymtl.ca> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <4766907f-6456-5acc-0b4e-9876d65c0a9c@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4930d51bf36a1182279d972150bce661@polymtl.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On 02/01/2017 06:25 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > I'll just mention it so we hopefully don't duplicate work, looking at > your patch has prompted me to start a patch adding a "disassembly_flags" > enum type. > > https://github.com/simark/binutils-gdb/tree/disas-flags Nice, thanks. Thanks, Pedro Alves