Re: [RFA] target record_core -> target record-core?

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>]

Doug Evans wrote:
> I realize this is a nit but is it possible to rename
> target record_core to target record-core?
> Or is it too late ...
> 
> All other targets (that I know of) use dashes in shortname, and having
> to remember which use dashes and which use underscores is, umm, blechy.
> [Unless we have and enforce a convention, it can only get worse,
> so might as well establish one now - if it doesn't exist already.]

I don't think anybody uses it, so this should be ok.

Hui?

> 
> 2010-04-18  Doug Evans  <dje@sebabeach.org>
> 
> 	* record.c (init_record_core_ops): Rename record_core to record_core.
> 
> Index: record.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/record.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.44
> diff -u -p -r1.44 record.c
> --- record.c	8 Mar 2010 13:34:38 -0000	1.44
> +++ record.c	19 Apr 2010 06:44:51 -0000
> @@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ record_core_has_execution (struct target
>  static void
>  init_record_core_ops (void)
>  {
> -  record_core_ops.to_shortname = "record_core";
> +  record_core_ops.to_shortname = "record-core";
>    record_core_ops.to_longname = "Process record and replay target";
>    record_core_ops.to_doc =
>      "Log program while executing and replay execution from log.";