From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8921 invoked by alias); 3 May 2010 01:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8911 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2010 01:38:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 01:38:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 11724 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 01:38:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 May 2010 01:38:18 -0000 Message-ID: <4BDE28F9.5040005@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 01:38:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb/PROBLEMS ? References: <201005021726.19409.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201005021726.19409.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > I looked over the described problems in gdb/PROBLEMS, and, it looks > to me that all of them fall in one of two categories: either > they've been fixed already, or aren't worth mentioning here. > Anyone wants to double check, or believes otherwise? I'll > be happy to adjust the patch. > I'd say to just toss the file entirely, and remove mentions of it in the documentation. It's really just a relic of pre-web days; I'd be astonished if there were any users who would think to look at it instead of going to our website. Stan