From: sami wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Change cplus_specific to an alocated struct
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFD440E.8080507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFD4230.3030600@redhat.com>
On 05/26/2010 11:45 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
> diff --git a/gdb/ada-lang.c b/gdb/ada-lang.c
> index 3b3894c..62e1251 100644
> --- a/gdb/ada-lang.c
> +++ b/gdb/ada-lang.c
> @@ -1142,32 +1142,32 @@ static struct htab *decoded_names_store;
> char *
> ada_decode_symbol (const struct general_symbol_info *gsymbol)
> {
> - char **resultp =
> - (char **)&gsymbol->language_specific.cplus_specific.demangled_name;
> - if (*resultp == NULL)
> + char *result = symbol_get_cplus_demangled_name (gsymbol);
> +
Changed char **resultp to char *result since demangled_name no longer
necessarily has an address. I didn't see why a pointer pointer was
needed so I hope I am not missing anything. My guess was that it is an
artifact left over from an earlier form of the function.
Also, both locations which call ada_decode_symbol (symbol_natural_name,
and symbol_demangled_name) check before call the function
cplus_specific.demangled_name. So, the check can perhaps be removed from
either the caller or callee.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-26 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 16:05 sami wagiaalla
2010-05-26 16:55 ` sami wagiaalla [this message]
2010-06-08 17:02 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-14 19:29 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-06-15 22:56 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-12 18:03 ` [patch 1/3] " sami wagiaalla
2010-07-13 17:16 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-16 14:15 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-07-16 15:24 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-12 18:06 ` [patch 2/3] " sami wagiaalla
2010-07-13 17:24 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-16 14:15 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-07-12 18:08 ` [patch 3/3] " sami wagiaalla
2010-07-13 17:38 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-16 14:15 ` sami wagiaalla
2010-07-16 15:29 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFD440E.8080507@redhat.com \
--to=swagiaal@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).