From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13522 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2010 16:56:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 13512 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2010 16:56:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:56:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5PGuAPB018278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:56:10 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5PGeswd004425 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:40:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4C24DB95.5000806@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:56:00 -0000 From: Sami Wagiaalla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB crash due to endless recursion in namespace lookup References: <201006251624.o5PGOHAX014293@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201006251624.o5PGOHAX014293@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 > Oops, I didn't see your email and just checked in a fix myself (which > seems more or less the same as yours) ... Sorry for the confusion! > Cool. Thanks :) I had the fix ready yesterday but the testsuite takes a while to run on my machine, but I should have replied to your email :). >> 2010-06-24 Sami Wagiaalla >> >> * gdb.cp/operator.cc: Created an import loop. >> * gdb.cp/operator.exp: Added testcase for import loop. > > Except I didn't add the test case since on my machine, I already had > several other tests failing due to the bug. But I guess you're right, > we should add the test anyway, for machines without the loop in the > system headers ... Please feel free to check in the test! > will do. > Thanks for the quick fix! No problem Sami