From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23412 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 20:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23308 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2010 20:02:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:28 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8781D3908B; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C38ACD939; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C508CD3.4070309@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: 7.2 branch, configure problem, --with-python References: <4C4F7A39.9030606@vmware.com> <20100728172017.GK13267@adacore.com> <4C50688B.1050105@vmware.com> <20100728173706.GO13267@adacore.com> <4C506FF0.3010405@vmware.com> <20100728180845.GT13267@adacore.com> <4C50728A.4090708@vmware.com> <20100728181926.GU13267@adacore.com> <4C507583.4010801@vmware.com> <20100728182734.GV13267@adacore.com> <4C508BE3.4000705@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4C508BE3.4000705@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder wrote: > Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> Are we talking about the same patch? >> Yep! > > I see -- I need to apply both changes to the branch. > > Well, that didn't help, and neither did applying the one change to HEAD. > > I tried configuring both with and without --enable-shared. > > In all cases, it tried to link statically. > > I'm thinking, if gdb links against python statically, that will > certainly bloat the gdb executable... > Hmmm, yes, unstripped gdb-7.2 is about 6 meg bigger than 7.1.