From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74626-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8641 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 20:04:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 8551 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2010 20:04:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:03:53 +0000
Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45])	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA14DB00E;	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08A8CD94C;	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C508D28.6090808@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Maintainers [was Re: [rx-sim]: add cycle accuracy]
References: <201007280206.o6S26g5e013725@greed.delorie.com> <20100727221503.59032690@mesquite.lan> <201007282002.o6SK2MhS007528@greed.delorie.com>
In-Reply-To: <201007282002.o6SK2MhS007528@greed.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2

DJ Delorie wrote:
>> DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> There doesn't seem to be an rx-specific sim maintainer.  Since I wrote
>>> it, should I be the maintainer?
> 
> Kevin replied:
>> Yes, I think you should be the maintainer for the rx sim.
> 
> Tom replied:
>> IMO, yes.
> 
> Does the SC need to make the final decision on this?

Nah!  You're the maintainer.  Add it to MAINTAINERS when you get around 
to it!   ;-)