From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30242 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 16:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 30232 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 16:37:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:37:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7JGb5c1000654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:37:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7JGb5j1030808 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:37:05 -0400 Received: from [10.15.16.129] (dhcp-10-15-16-129.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.129]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7JGb4BA013374 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:37:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6D5DA0.90601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:37:00 -0000 From: sami wagiaalla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [patch 2/2] Use custom hash function with bcache [Re: [RFC] Use custom hash function with bcache] References: <4C6946E1.6000709@redhat.com> <4C6BF870.7010203@redhat.com> <4C6D5CC2.8060403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C6D5CC2.8060403@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 On 08/19/2010 12:33 PM, sami wagiaalla wrote: > On 08/18/2010 11:24 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>> "Sami" == sami wagiaalla writes: >> >> Sami> Although, you are right, there is no strict type checking. Are you >> Sami> suggesting we make psymbol_cache a new type ? >> >> Yeah; at least, if it isn't too big. >> > > Patch attached. > Updated subject; this^ is patch 2/2