From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15022 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2010 17:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 14883 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2010 17:34:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:33:56 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A444016; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C06C9B19; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7BEB80.9020002@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:34:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100702) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Mark Kettenis , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t References: <20100830071040.GB6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008300814.o7U8ECNZ009010@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:14:12 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> The _t suffix is actually reserved by POSIX, so using it is actually a >> bad idea. Perhaps change it to gdb_target_signal, or just >> target_signal (making it a typedef for an anonymous enum)? > > I see too many types in GDB and everywhere ending with _t (ptid_t for all). > > I do not mind at all about the type name but before reposting the patchset > I would like agreement from one more global maintainer. ptid_t was an extension from pid_t, which is a posix typedef I think.