From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15554 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2012 02:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15544 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2012 02:55:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:55:01 +0000 Received: from [70.170.59.51] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1RizxM-0003Mw-IQ for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:55:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4F066283.2090609@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:55:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC stub-side break conditions 1/5] Documentation bits References: <4F05BA03.1010203@mentor.com> <4F065A2E.6020508@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4F065A2E.6020508@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da9408175bd9a9967c1901bdda0e41f5b6304350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 On 1/5/12 6:19 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 01/05/2012 10:56 PM, Luis Machado wrote: >> * NEWS: Mention target-side conditional breakpoint support. > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > To align with subject, I doubt it should be "stub-side" rather than > "target-side". > I would prefer to say "target-side" everywhere actually - no one really knows what we mean by "stub", and if they try to understand it by looking at, say, our foo-stub.c files, they'll get really confused. :-) "Target-side" has the right connotation of "outside GDB" but without committing to a specific implementation strategy - like conditional breakpoint tests in h/w debug registers, which would be the most awesome... Stan