public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb: call frame unwinders' dealloc_cache methods through destroying the frame cache
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 08:40:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a9f858c-06f0-0656-29a9-3dab53bad737@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130200249.131155-2-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

On 1/30/23 21:02, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Currently, some frame resources are deallocated by iterating on the
> frame chain (starting from the sentinel), calling dealloc_cache.  The
> problem is that user-created frames are not part of that chain, so we
> never call dealloc_cache for them.
> 
> I propose to make it so the dealloc_cache callbacks are called when the
> frames are removed from the frame_stash hash table, by registering a
> deletion function to the hash table.  This happens when
> frame_stash_invalidate is called by reinit_frame_cache.  This way, all
> frames registered in the cache will get their unwinder's dealloc_cache
> callbacks called.
> 
> Note that at the moment, the sentinel frames are not registered in the
> cache, so we won't call dealloc_cache for them.  However, it's just a
> theoritical problem, because the sentinel frame unwinder does not
> provide this callback.  Also, a subsequent patch will change things so
> that sentinel frames are registered to the cache.
> 
> I moved the obstack_free / obstack_init pair below the
> frame_stash_invalidate call in reinit_frame_cache, because I assumed
> that some dealloc_cache would need to access some data on that obstack,
> so it would be better to free it after clearing the hash table.
> 

For me this causes:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.btrace/record_goto.exp: instruction-history from 19 forwards
record goto 27^M
/data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/record-btrace.c:1654: internal-error: 
bfcache_new: Assertion `*slot == NULL' failed.^M
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,^M
further debugging may prove unreliable.^M
----- Backtrace -----^M
FAIL: gdb.btrace/record_goto.exp: record goto 27 (GDB internal error)
...

Note that I've been having some problems with btrace tests, possible 
related to cpu/kernel combination (PRs 30073 and 30075), so this may be 
difficult to reproduce, I'm not sure.

Thanks,
- Tom

> Change-Id: If4f9b38266b458c4e2f7eb43e933090177c22190
> ---
>   gdb/frame.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
> index a08a8f47ebc4..fed961b2a8df 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,22 @@ frame_addr_hash_eq (const void *a, const void *b)
>     return f_entry->this_id.value == f_element->this_id.value;
>   }
>   
> +/* Deletion function for the frame cache hash table.  */
> +
> +static void
> +frame_info_del (void *frame_v)
> +{
> +  frame_info *frame = (frame_info *) frame_v;
> +
> +  if (frame->prologue_cache != nullptr
> +      && frame->unwind->dealloc_cache != nullptr)
> +    frame->unwind->dealloc_cache (frame, frame->prologue_cache);
> +
> +  if (frame->base_cache != nullptr
> +      && frame->base->unwind->dealloc_cache != nullptr)
> +    frame->base->unwind->dealloc_cache (frame, frame->base_cache);
> +}
> +
>   /* Internal function to create the frame_stash hash table.  100 seems
>      to be a good compromise to start the hash table at.  */
>   
> @@ -268,7 +284,7 @@ frame_stash_create (void)
>     frame_stash = htab_create (100,
>   			     frame_addr_hash,
>   			     frame_addr_hash_eq,
> -			     NULL);
> +			     frame_info_del);
>   }
>   
>   /* Internal function to add a frame to the frame_stash hash table.
> @@ -2048,26 +2064,19 @@ reinit_frame_cache (void)
>   {
>     ++frame_cache_generation;
>   
> -  /* Tear down all frame caches.  */
> -  for (frame_info *fi = sentinel_frame; fi != NULL; fi = fi->prev)
> -    {
> -      if (fi->prologue_cache && fi->unwind->dealloc_cache)
> -	fi->unwind->dealloc_cache (fi, fi->prologue_cache);
> -      if (fi->base_cache && fi->base->unwind->dealloc_cache)
> -	fi->base->unwind->dealloc_cache (fi, fi->base_cache);
> -    }
> -
> -  /* Since we can't really be sure what the first object allocated was.  */
> -  obstack_free (&frame_cache_obstack, 0);
> -  obstack_init (&frame_cache_obstack);
> -
>     if (sentinel_frame != NULL)
>       annotate_frames_invalid ();
>   
> -  sentinel_frame = NULL;		/* Invalidate cache */
>     invalidate_selected_frame ();
> +
> +  /* Invalidate cache.  */
> +  sentinel_frame = NULL;
>     frame_stash_invalidate ();
>   
> +  /* Since we can't really be sure what the first object allocated was.  */
> +  obstack_free (&frame_cache_obstack, 0);
> +  obstack_init (&frame_cache_obstack);
> +
>     for (frame_info_ptr &iter : frame_info_ptr::frame_list)
>       iter.invalidate ();
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-09  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-30 20:02 [PATCH 0/2] Fix gdb.base/frame-view.exp on AArch64 Simon Marchi
2023-01-30 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] gdb: call frame unwinders' dealloc_cache methods through destroying the frame cache Simon Marchi
2023-02-09  7:40   ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-02-09 12:42     ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-09 19:53       ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-30 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] gdb: give sentinel for user frames distinct IDs, register sentinel frames to " Simon Marchi
2023-02-07 17:02   ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-02-08 21:37     ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-08 17:05   ` Luis Machado
2023-02-08 21:38     ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a9f858c-06f0-0656-29a9-3dab53bad737@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).