Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)

[xgsa <xgsa@yandex.ru>]

Thanks for the note, Ulrich. Unfortunately, I have missed Jan's message 
about fails somehow. Moreover, I was in vacation for the last few weeks, 
so I read your message just now. I'll look at those tests and provide 
the fix.


Thanks,
Anton.

-------- Original message --------
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:28:26 +0200, xgsa wrote:
>>>> Yeah. I'm sorry about the delay. The patch is ok, please check it in.
>>> Checked in.
>> Fedora 17 x86_64:
>> +FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp: list children of s.public in type_update_when_use_rtti
>> +FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp: list children of s.ptr (without RTTI) in type_update_when_use_rtti
>> +FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp: list children of s.ptr.public (without RTTI) in type_update_when_use_rtti
> Yes, I'm seeing similar failures on a number of platforms (arm, spu, s390x).
>
> The reason seems to be that the test case is attempting to display local
> variables that are not yet initialized, and thus their contents are random.
> For C++ objects, this includes a random vtable pointer ...
>
> Now, this particular sub-test appears to do this deliberately; all the other
> sub-tests only create the varobj *after* their corresponding objects were
> initialized.  I'm not quite sure what exactly the test is supposed to be
> testing, but I guess it ought to be done differently ...
>
> Bye,
> Ulrich
>