Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] glibc-2.34: Fix gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp failure/error

[Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>]

Hi,

On 2023-01-05 1:35 p.m., Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 7/20/22 03:53, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022-02-26 19:00, Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>> This series addresses Pedro's concerns regarding the v2 series posted
>>> last year:
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-August/181575.html
>>>
>>> In particular, it introduces a new exception which will be thrown
>>> when GDB receives a SIGTERM.  That exception is handled at the
>>> top level when possible, though for the extension languages, Python
>>> and Guile, a somewhat different approach had to be taken.  In order to
>>> ensure that this new exception isn't inadvertently swallowed on its
>>> way up to the top level, I also did an audit of the try / catch code
>>> involving gdb_exception, making adjustments where necessary.
>>
>> I started to look at a gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp failure, searched the
>> list for mentions of that test, and found this series which I think
>> addresses exactly the failure I am seeing.  I'm just mentioning this to
>> bump the thread :).
> 
> Hi,
> 
> likewise bumping the thread, and noting that the series can claim to fix PR https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 .
> 

I'm taking a look at this one.

> Thanks,
> - Tom