From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22344 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2013 11:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22333 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2013 11:33:46 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:33:46 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r91BXhjO002887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:33:43 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r91BXfOM021441; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:33:42 -0400 Message-ID: <524AB315.7030400@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:33:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/gdbserver/LynxOS]: Incomplete thread list after --attach References: <1380621039-25204-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <524A9C9E.2040407@redhat.com> <20131001100200.GA2840@adacore.com> <524AA113.5070008@redhat.com> <20131001105235.GE2840@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20131001105235.GE2840@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 On 10/01/2013 11:52 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Well, how are you sure they're unpublished, if you don't know >> at least approximately which interfaces it's using? (reading /proc, >> using ptrace+peeking at program memory, etc.) ;-) I've really no >> clue on the ABI garantees copying newer/older "ps" to an older/newer >> system would have, but I'd expect it to have some. > > That's true. In the end, I wasn't able to get that piece of information, > as I could not find a tool on LynxOS that can trace system calls. > There is no /proc, and I couldn't find anything in /dev that seems > related to that sort of thing. We could always ask the LynxOS folks (lynuxworks.com it seems), if we wanted to bother, I guess. Oh well, I personally don't care that much. >>> +/* Assuming we've just attached to a running inferior whose pid is PID, >>> + add all threads runnnig in that process. */ >> >> "running". > > Thanks. I will fix that before checking in. Thanks. -- Pedro Alves