From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10850 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2013 00:25:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10830 invoked by uid 89); 2 Nov 2013 00:25:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GARBLED_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:25:06 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VcP1S-0005TW-FQ from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:25:02 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:25:02 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:25:01 -0700 Message-ID: <52744600.9020205@codesourcery.com> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:25:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] set/show code-cache NEWS and doc References: <1382516855-32218-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1382516855-32218-6-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83sivshuux.fsf@gnu.org> <5268D967.2000703@codesourcery.com> <837gd2itkj.fsf@gnu.org> <526A3B07.1020607@codesourcery.com> <83ob6dhdpt.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ob6dhdpt.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On 10/25/2013 06:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> How about "executable code"? > I would suggest "code section", unless you think that is incorrect for > some reason. GDB can also access code generated by JIT, but they are not from "code section". On the other hand, "read code section" usually means "read code section in executable file" rather than "read code section in live inferior". -- Yao (齐尧)