public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>,
	gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate UNSUPPORTED_ERROR.
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A8BA3D.9020403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9bCMRyMQESGWQFSsB-+OJ=eSgtcnNcC6J4hDxq5n6kSY=c6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/11/2013 04:33 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> > -         /* Should we fallback to ye olde GDB script mode?  */
>> > -         if (script_ext_mode == script_ext_soft
>> > -             && e.reason == RETURN_ERROR && e.error == UNSUPPORTED_ERROR)
>> > -           {
>> > -             fseek (stream, 0, SEEK_SET);
>> > -             script_from_file (stream, (char*) file);
>> > -           }
>> > -         else
>> > -           {
>> > -             /* Nope, just punt.  */
>> > -             throw_exception (e);
>> > -           }
>> > +         /* Fallback to GDB script mode.  */
>> > +         fseek (stream, 0, SEEK_SET);
>> > +         script_from_file (stream, (char*) file);
> Remove the fseek and cast.

Hmm, indeed the fseek doesn't look necessary.  Will do.  However,
that makes me wonder whether I'm missing something, as it doesn't
look necessary before my patch either.  Was it ever really
needed?  I see you added it (and the unnecessary cast too ;-) ) in:
  https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00110.html
but I can't tell why.

-- 
Pedro Alves

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 10:30 [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Hui Zhu
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-28 10:56   ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-28 17:38     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-29  9:41       ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-29 15:27     ` [pushed] Plug target side conditions and commands leaks (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 16:05     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2013-12-02 12:45       ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-02 14:38         ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-03  4:50           ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-03  4:54             ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-06 19:29             ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-08  5:19               ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-08  8:34                 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-08 14:18                   ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-09 19:48                 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 21:07                   ` Doug Evans
2013-12-10 17:34                     ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 18:14                       ` [PATCH] Eliminate UNSUPPORTED_ERROR Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:33                         ` Doug Evans
2013-12-11 19:17                           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-12-12  4:23                             ` Doug Evans
2013-12-12 10:23                               ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:40                       ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Doug Evans
2013-12-12 10:55                     ` breakpoint.c:insert_bp_location: Constify local. (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-12-12 12:55                     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2014-01-09 18:36                       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52A8BA3D.9020403@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hui_zhu@mentor.com \
    --cc=xdje42@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).