From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29396 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2014 13:23:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29383 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2014 13:23:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:23:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s08DNBxN007251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:23:11 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s08DN96X031115; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:23:10 -0500 Message-ID: <52CD513D.5090704@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:23:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] change solib-frv to use entry_point_address_query References: <1389040247-2620-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1389040247-2620-2-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1389040247-2620-2-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On 01/06/2014 08:30 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > This is just a minor cleanup in advance of some other changes, that > modifies solib-frv.c to use entry_point_address_query. I don't have a > good way to test this but I think it is obviously correct. Agreed. -- Pedro Alves