From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15516 invoked by alias); 13 May 2014 19:19:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15504 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2014 19:19:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 19:19:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4DJJFD7006106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 May 2014 15:19:16 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4DJJDAo012194; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:19:14 -0400 Message-ID: <53727031.30402@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 19:19:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson CC: Florian Weimer , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Demangler crash handler References: <20140509100656.GA4760@blade.nx> <201405091120.s49BKO1f010622@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <87fvkhjqvs.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20140513102223.GC17805@blade.nx> <87ppjhilni.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <53726791.5080300@redhat.com> <20140513191600.GB26575@blade.nx> In-Reply-To: <20140513191600.GB26575@blade.nx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On 05/13/14 20:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: >> Or you could just pass that list through c++filt, the binutils >> program, which also uses the same demangler. That might be >> faster, though obviously won't catch gdb-specific bugs. > > c++filt would be enough to catch the crashes we've seen recently. > It would be best to have c++filt built with the latest libiberty > from GCC upstream, as two fixes have gone in recently. The fix should have been merged to the binutils-gdb repo too, then it's just a matter of building binutils ToT. Has it not been yet? We need to make sure that's done. -- Pedro Alves