From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 555 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 10:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 532 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2014 10:39:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:39:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4LAcxe9012089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 May 2014 06:38:59 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4LAcvtI030389; Wed, 21 May 2014 06:38:58 -0400 Message-ID: <537C8241.20909@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:39:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Arnez , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1 References: <1400168975-3145-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2 On 05/19/2014 08:32 AM, Andreas Arnez wrote: > On Thu, May 15 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: > >> This is the first half of the "regset rework preparations" series I've >> posted as RFC: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html > > On Wed, May 14 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >>> From: Andreas Arnez >>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200 >>> >>> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series >>> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are >>> still uncommented. I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly >>> for the architecture-specific changes. >> >> Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my >> review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or >> so. But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend >> on that one which seem useful in their own right. >> >>> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No >>> comments yet. >>> >>>> * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"): >>>> Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10. >>> >>> Approved by Mark Kettenis: >>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html >> >> I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE. I'd give it >> a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the >> opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7 >> and 8 after that. > > As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on > patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Apart from those I believe everything else > in this series was approved already. > > OK to push? > I've read the series, and it all looked fine to me. Please push. -- Pedro Alves