From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5469 invoked by alias); 22 May 2014 07:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5449 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2014 07:28:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:28:52 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:28:49 +0100 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:28:46 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69ED219004D for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:28:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.248]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s4M7SkRD65470536 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:28:46 GMT Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s4M7SjM2028816 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:28:46 -0400 Received: from [9.152.212.211] (dyn-9-152-212-211.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.211]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s4M7SjVO028805; Thu, 22 May 2014 03:28:45 -0400 Message-ID: <537DA72D.4080600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 07:28:00 -0000 From: Andreas Krebbel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves , arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1 References: <1400168975-3145-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <537C8241.20909@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <537C8241.20909@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14052207-8372-0000-0000-000009C71E3A X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00530.txt.bz2 On 05/21/2014 12:38 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/19/2014 08:32 AM, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> On Thu, May 15 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> >>> This is the first half of the "regset rework preparations" series I've >>> posted as RFC: >>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html >> >> On Wed, May 14 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> >>>> From: Andreas Arnez >>>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200 >>>> >>>> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series >>>> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are >>>> still uncommented. I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly >>>> for the architecture-specific changes. >>> >>> Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my >>> review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or >>> so. But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend >>> on that one which seem useful in their own right. >>> >>>> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No >>>> comments yet. >>>> >>>>> * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"): >>>>> Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10. >>>> >>>> Approved by Mark Kettenis: >>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html >>> >>> I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE. I'd give it >>> a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the >>> opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7 >>> and 8 after that. >> >> As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on >> patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Apart from those I believe everything else >> in this series was approved already. >> >> OK to push? >> > > I've read the series, and it all looked fine to me. > > Please push. > Done. Thanks! -Andreas-