* gdb-7.8 branching status update
@ 2014-06-02 17:21 Joel Brobecker
2014-06-02 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2014-06-02 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: keiths, dje
Hello,
Today was the day we targetted for creating the GDB 7.8 branch.
But we still have 2 issues identified as blocking before we can do so:
- Performance issue induced by PR gdb/16253. Not sure if a decision
on how to deal with this regression was reached. Keith and Doug?
- infrun regression on platforms using software single step (Eg AIX).
See PR gdb/17000. A patch was sent this past weekend, and is
awaiting review.
We're going to follow those two AIs day by day until we can branch...
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update
2014-06-02 17:21 gdb-7.8 branching status update Joel Brobecker
@ 2014-06-02 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-03 8:22 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2014-06-02 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches; +Cc: keiths, dje
On 06/02/2014 06:21 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> - infrun regression on platforms using software single step (Eg AIX).
> See PR gdb/17000. A patch was sent this past weekend, and is
> awaiting review.
I've been poking at this one all day long. I noticed something while
reviewing it, and then hit a stack of issues. I'll reply very soon.
I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html
Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against
gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or
so ago. :-/
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update
2014-06-02 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2014-06-03 8:22 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-03 8:32 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-03 13:43 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2014-06-03 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches, Keith Seitz
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 06:21 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
>> - infrun regression on platforms using software single step (Eg AIX).
>> See PR gdb/17000. A patch was sent this past weekend, and is
>> awaiting review.
>
> I've been poking at this one all day long. I noticed something while
> reviewing it, and then hit a stack of issues. I'll reply very soon.
>
> I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html
>
> Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against
> gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or
> so ago. :-/
I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs
in corefile.exp.
vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and
gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd.
At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update
2014-06-03 8:22 ` Doug Evans
@ 2014-06-03 8:32 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-03 8:36 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-03 13:43 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2014-06-03 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Evans; +Cc: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches, Keith Seitz
On 06/03/2014 09:22 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html
>>
>> Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against
>> gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or
>> so ago. :-/
>
> I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs
> in corefile.exp.
> vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and
> gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd.
> At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow.
That's sounds just like the break-interp.exp crashes mentioned above.
Markus followed up already (silly archives don't cross the month
boundary), but I haven't managed to reply yet, still busy with
the software step stuff.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update
2014-06-03 8:32 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2014-06-03 8:36 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2014-06-03 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches, Keith Seitz
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 09:22 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too:
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html
>>>
>>> Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against
>>> gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or
>>> so ago. :-/
>>
>> I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs
>> in corefile.exp.
>> vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and
>> gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd.
>> At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow.
>
> That's sounds just like the break-interp.exp crashes mentioned above.
> Markus followed up already (silly archives don't cross the month
> boundary), but I haven't managed to reply yet, still busy with
> the software step stuff.
It is indeed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update
2014-06-03 8:22 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-03 8:32 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2014-06-03 13:43 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2014-06-03 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Evans; +Cc: Pedro Alves, gdb-patches, Keith Seitz
> > I've been poking at this one all day long. I noticed something while
> > reviewing it, and then hit a stack of issues. I'll reply very soon.
> >
> > I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html
> >
> > Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against
> > gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or
> > so ago. :-/
>
> I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs
> in corefile.exp.
> vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and
> gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd.
> At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow.
I've added an entry in the TODO of our wiki page. If you have
a PR, can you add the reference there? From what I understand,
Pedro was going to look at it, so I put his name on the entry.
Can we get a quick update on where we stand on the performance
regression AI?
Thanks!
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-03 13:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-02 17:21 gdb-7.8 branching status update Joel Brobecker
2014-06-02 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-03 8:22 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-03 8:32 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-03 8:36 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-03 13:43 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).