From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15546 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2014 11:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15534 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2014 11:30:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:30:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5JBUJ0d022897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:30:20 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5JBUIFp022411; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:30:19 -0400 Message-ID: <53A2C9CA.4060802@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:30:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression with default scheduler-locking=step [Re: [pushed] Consecutive step-overs trigger internal error.] References: <1398191068-7631-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <20140617192406.GB10997@host2.jankratochvil.net> <53A1998D.7090006@redhat.com> <20140618175709.GA9237@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20140618175709.GA9237@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00700.txt.bz2 On 06/18/2014 06:57 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:52:13 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Here's a fix. Let me know what you think. > > The change looks OK and as it fixes the assertion I am for the patch. Thanks. Now pushed to both master and gdb-7.8-branch. -- Pedro Alves