From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5715 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2014 09:58:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5703 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2014 09:58:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:58:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7J9w9DT022571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:58:09 -0400 Received: from [10.36.6.50] (vpn1-6-50.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.50]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7J9w78R010738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:58:08 -0400 Message-ID: <53F31FAF.4060106@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:58:00 -0000 From: Nicholas Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MSP430 SIM: Add support for hardware multiply References: <87zjislnam.fsf@redhat.com> <5804568.hLA7fg3VQR@vapier> In-Reply-To: <5804568.hLA7fg3VQR@vapier> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2 Hi Mike, [Sorry for the long time in replying to your email] > any reason for the compression ? its size doesn't seem to justify it at all. Nope - just a snafu. > the global static vars really look like they should be part of the cpu or sim > state and not just global variables. otherwise you can't easily reset them ? True - I will fix that soon. Cheers Nick